JR Snell Capital Management, LLC

For months and months (or maybe even a year) I’ve been banging on the table about how I expect that a decent portion of account returns for 2010 might just come from long-term (20+ years) government bonds.

I anticipate that US Treasury securities will continue to be our baseline method providing the ability to persevere for the next who-knows-how-long.

and…

I would expect that between positioning in and out of Treasuries as appropriate and positioning in and out of equities as appropriate, our clients will continue to persevere… and quite possibly prosper.

You can read these quotes in context here. You can also review some of my other musings about the long US Treasury Bond “opportunity” here and here.

This is how we felt about long-term treasuries last year at Thanksgiving, from our post called, “Picking at Your Turkey”:

Following this premise, it wouldn’t hurt to accumulate some longer treasuries… like in the 20 year (give or take 5) range. I hear people whining about only getting 4.20% on a 20 year treasury… but I think if a person accepts what might be the ”new normal”… 4.20% might not look that bad, in hindsight.

We’re not married to holding on to the things for 20 years though. If we were presented with some outsized gains on our treasuries over the next year or two, we wouldn’t be afraid to take the profits and find a new home for the proceeds.

We are in line with mainstream thought in that we believe that bonds as an asset class (and specifically long-term government bonds) might be a good thing to have in your portfolio at most times. However, we depart from the mainstream because we do not statically allocate a portion of a clients’ portfolio to bonds and then hang on for hell or high water. Radically, we believe that there might be times when it is not a good time to make new purchases of the “long bond”.

And in a further logical departure from current financial dogma, we believe that there are even a few times where it’s in our best interest to actually sell them out of our accounts completely.

NOW WOULD BE ONE OF THOSE TIMES.

I usually write a letter to clients that we include with the quarterly performance reports that all clients receive. I believe, in light of recent market movements that this quarter’s letter might be of interest to a broader range of folks. Please contact us if you have any questions or you wish to begin our free Roadmap Analysis to see if you’re on track to meet your financial goals.

Dear Client,

To say that the last three months have been dramatic is to REALLY say something because it comes on the heels of a heart-stopping stock market selloff followed by a mind-bending reaction rally… the likes of which haven’t been seen since Herbert Hoover was in office.

And who could forget that that it has been only about a decade since the stock market last showed us it’s “teeth”? It’s certainly been an era to feel like one could easily get “bitten” as an investor.

Of course recently, just at the point that it feels like we deserve to have some stock and bond market stability, we are again subjected to the kind of volatility extremes that have been cropping up more and more often the last few years. Have we been shown that we’re only living in the “eye of the financial storm” at the moment?

The first quarter of 2010 seemed to come and go quietly as we moved toward ever higher highs. I jotted a web site update in mid-May as I noted that I was feeling a certain level of complacency creeping back in to investor’s attitudes about the markets. Since then I’ve also been reminded by a client of a web site update from February of 2009 in which I wrote the following…

At present, I’m thinking that we’re probably looking at some serious deflation for a while and then a very muted, long term half recovery that could stretch out to a decade or so.

This leads me to a place where cash is king at the moment for most of our money.

Fortunately, these things usually unveil in slow motion. So slow in fact that people begin to dismiss their earlier premises and question their previous conclusions even though they are probably still correct.

Could it be just that simple? Could it be that many investors have dismissed their earlier correct assumptions because it is all taking so long? Is this “thing” so massive and lumbering that it can only unfold in “slow motion”?

During the second quarter, the buzz suddenly became about sovereign debt, which we’ve known for a while was going to become a problem one day soon. It appears that “one day soon” might be nearer than we thought and the market has been asking the question, “If the rescuers need rescuing, who is left to bail out whom?”

The tacit assumption has long been that China will provide some base level of support for the balance of the world via overwhelming demand for everything in the face of an otherwise global economic slowdown. However, there’s been recent chatter about a growing housing bubble in China and speculation that this might just be “the other shoe” to drop on an otherwise fragile global economy, bringing Round Two of the Global Financial Crisis with it.

But it hasn’t been just the stock and the bond markets that have been particularly quarrelsome the past few years. It’s been downright difficult, if not treacherous being an investor in any arena. For instance, real estate did something that it has never done before: It decreased in value. Conventional wisdom had it that despite the leverage routinely used by real estate investors, it was still considered a “safe” investment because real estate prices have never, ever gone down… not even during the Great Depression. The only safe bet now is that investors will never look at real estate investments the same way again.

Other types of investments have all experienced similar difficulties: Private loans, small business loans, real estate loans and partnerships, even previously assumed long time successes such as Bernie Madoff and a host of other Ponzi-schemers that have all been discovered to be “swimming naked” the moment the money tide went out.

So, while the financial turmoil of the past couple of years wipes out or changes much of the world’s conventional wisdom, it also performs a “cleansing” that presents new opportunities with new players in a new financial landscape.

All of the turmoil of the past few years will one day pass and the opportunities will be there for those of us who refuse to focus on the past. We need to keep our focus on keeping our minds open to the new and different opportunities that most certainly will present themselves in the future… while persevering through the “creative destruction” that we find ourselves in the midst of today.

Our Current Outlook

Bill Gross of PIMCO (Pacific Investment Management Co) speaks of an economic era that we are entering that he is calling the “new normal”. In recent papers he has been going into great detail as to the justification behind his theory, but basically “new normal” means an extended period of sub-par growth throughout world economies.

A favorite theory being embraced by what I believe might be the majority of investors is this theory that some day in the not too distant future we will be wrestling with some significant inflation pressures… possibly even a stagflation situation (stagnant economy, rising prices).

Over the past year or so, I’ve been inclined to side with those that anticipate inflation, but now I am beginning to modify my view of our future world. I’m beginning to consider the possibility that our current Keynesian monetary policy of flooding the economy with money MAY NOT lead to inflationary pressures. After watching unemployment not respond to unprecedented government spending, and housing not respond to historically low interest rates, I’m starting to see the US economy and perhaps the world economy as a “leaky bucket”: We continue to pour more and more into the bucket, but it is leaking out just as quickly (or even more quickly).

What is the “leak” in the bucket? I believe the “leak” is the process of deleveraging… up and down the line… from the smallest of consumers struggling to pay off their JC Penney charge card all the way up to the nation of Greece struggling to pay down their country’s debt.

Until the world deleverages, nations can pour as much money as they want into their respective economies and still not see net economic gains. They can throw it toward bailing out the banks, or homeowners, or other countries. At the end of the day it is just moving it from one side of someone’s balance sheet to the other side of someone else’s balance sheet.

The only solution is time. We need time as individuals and as nations to deleverage ourselves. I’ve expressed my thoughts to many of you that our financial issues are “generational”… meaning that it will take a generation for them to work themselves through. For example, our exit from the housing crisis could come as a result of enough people walking away from their mortgages… but it will only transfer the debt to the bank and then to the government as the bank is again bailed out and then ultimately on to you and me in the form of higher taxes or an extended slow-growth economy. Another way to exit the housing crisis is to wait for enough people to have paid down enough of their mortgages to again be “above water” allowing normalcy to return to the housing market. I’m assuming it is to be a combination of both… but the end result is the same: It will take time. This is my version of Bill Gross’s “new normal”.

While one set of opportunities has been winding down for the last few years, a new set of opportunities has yet to reveal itself. This leaves us in a bit of a “no man’s land” in the investment landscape. But again, to simply persevere and avoid chasing “old” opportunities will insure our ability to take advantage of our as yet unseen future.

Specifically

I anticipate that US Treasury securities will continue to be our baseline method providing the ability to persevere for the next who-knows-how-long. I believe that part of the new normal involves some moderate level of deflation for the foreseeable future, allowing your purchasing power to increase even without any real investment returns.

I expect that we will continue to see extended and significant moves up and down in the stock markets… probably quite similar to what we experienced between the end of 2007, down to the March of 2009 lows and then up to the April of 2010 highs. Our opportunities in the stock market will come by accepting that there is a disconnect between the stock market and the economy and by taking advantage of the volatility that we are sure to experience because of it.

Although the market may show little to no net increase over the next decade or two, I would expect that between positioning in and out of Treasuries as appropriate and positioning in and out of equities as appropriate, our clients will continue to persevere… and quite possibly prosper.

As always, I am honored to be your guide through these historical times. Please feel free to call or email if you have any questions or need any assistance.

Jeff Snell

Managing Member, JR Snell Capital Management, LLC

If you’ve “subscribed” to get web site updates to keep one eye on the market while you do other things… this post is for you.

In my post “Market Timing for Dummies” I describe a methodology that I use to help us decide if we want to be generally in, or generally out of stocks. It’s not necessary to go into detail about the methodology of the indicator we use, as I go into it in detail here.

Click to Enlarge

Also, as a “bribe” for subscribing, you would have received a free report that describes how we use this indicator, how to calculate it and how to get it on your computer desktop for free.

If you’ve subscribed in the past and no longer have the report, please email us and we’ll send a copy. Use the Contact Us form and put in the comments that you are a subscriber to my blog and you’d like to receive a copy of the Market Timing Report.

…and if you haven’t subscribed to receive blog updates, then go here to subscribe and you’ll get a copy of the report for free.

Oh yeah… Why am I mentioning this now? Because as of Friday July 2nd, 2010, we kicked into a Bear Market according to this indicator.

Will the market crash? Will the indicator show a “false negative”? Hard to say, but rules is rules and if you’re following this indicator for some of your long term stock investments… well, it’s time to exit them for right now.

“…random.”

Not what you were expecting?  Most folks would have finished the sentence “…not an indicator of future outcomes.” Or something similar.

It’s interesting to note that nearly every investor has been so brainwashed to this statement that they don’t really ”hear” it anymore. It’s in one ear and out the other and despite the warning, most investors and advisers demonstrate their conviction that the past performance of a mutual fund DOES matter by continuing to construct financial plans, asset allocation targets and efficient frontiers around the practice of analyzing the past to predict the future.

Actually, past performance may say something about the future of a mutual fund, but not in the way one would expect. A recent Standard & Poor’s research paper titled, “Does Past Performance Matter?” points out that the bottom quartile of mutual funds by performance are consistently the most likely to go out of business, be shut down, or be bought up and merged. Logically, I can understand this. Since investors continue to focus on past performance when a fund performs poorly they are more likely to extract their money from that fund. When a fund’s outflows drain it to a certain point, it is no longer profitable to keep running the fund. Close it, sell it, merge it.

What about the best of the rest?  Here are some facts from S&P’s recent report:

1. 1.7% of large-cap funds, 2.2% of mid-cap funds, and 4.6% of small-cap funds maintained a top-half ranking over five consecutive 12-month periods. Random expectations would suggest a rate of 6.25%.
2. 18.5% of large-cap funds with a top quartile ranking over the five years ending March 2005 maintained a top quartile ranking over the next five years. Only 12.7% of mid-cap funds and 25.0% of small-cap funds maintained a top quartile performance over the same period. Random expectations would suggest a repeat rate of 25%.

The report looks at a number of different time frames and durations and IN EVERY EXAMPLE one would have achieved better investment results by randomly selecting a mutual fund.

If you turn this analysis around, the conclusion is that selecting a mutual fund to invest in by researching and ranking historical returns will actually encourage a less successful investment experience going forward than simply throwing a dart.

We’ve always avoided mutual funds for our clients because of the costs of them, now we have another reason.

The latest market meltdown has gotten folks asking me about our performance as compared to the stock market (again). But I’ve always thought a little differently about comparing our management of client accounts against various indices. (The industry calls this “benchmarking”.)

I find it interesting that investors would want to compare whole portfolio returns to the stock market. It’s funny how consumers of financial products maintain this decision bias by wanting to compare all returns “against the market” to decide if they’re getting good advice or not.

I don’t think investors are necessarily to blame for this bias… I think our industry might have brainwashed people to think this way. After being subjected to the stream of advertisements on TV and in magazines comparing “this fund” and “that fund” against the market, what can we expect investors to do when looking for intelligent ways to discern between copius financial choices?

To get market returns… or a reasonable comparison between what you’re doing versus what the market has done, you have to accept “market risk”. Yet, what I know from innumerable conversations with real people who have real concerns, investors do not want to accept “market risk” for the entirety of their investments.

I think a better “benchmark” to judge portfolio performance would be to compare your performance to what you set out to do. I call this “Personal Benchmarking”. Once you’ve released your portfolio from the chains of relative performance and embraced the concept of absolute performance (Personal Benchmarking) all investment decisions become significantly easier to make and to manage.

If you’ve planned that you’ll need a certain average annual rate of return to make your retirement work, what relevance is the stock market to you personally? It’s one of the hardest concepts to get your head around… but it’s worth it when you do… kind of Zen-like if you will.

So, we try to use the stock market as simply a tool to help us to reach your objectives. To do this, we have to first define your objectives, then we have to have the courage to “walk away” from the market when necessary and to exploit it when possible. (Hint: Get this report.)

If you REALLY think about doing things this way, you are naturally going to under perform when the market is “hot” and “risky”… and you’re going to outperform (sometimes significantly) when the market craters. But then again, who cares? The goal isn’t to “beat the market”, the goal is to continue on a track to meet your personal objectives?

For those of you wondering, I’m still here and still active. There are a few reasons that I haven’t written a lot here recently and a few reasons why I am ready to be a little more active poster these days.

Ahh priorities… Clients always get first whack at my time. I might be on the more  “public” tasks of preparing annual reports, quarterly reports, talking to accountants, compiling year-end numbers, or working on each client’s annual Roadmap planning updates.

Or, I might be on the more “in house” tasks of balancing or rebalancing client accounts, analyzing stock positions, considering stock positions, research, trading into or out of something that I like or don’t like, etc.

These two priorities have kept me pretty busy… end of year and most recently end of quarter stuff… But, I’ve also been busy with my second course of action, which is helping new people to become new clients. Since I really take my time with their stuff and all new clients go through the process of figuring out where they are and where they want to be, this can take a lot of time.

After all of this, comes time for blatant self promotion and article-writing… which includes sitting back (a little… not enough to tip over my chair) and observing the world of the markets with a fresh enough eye to comment on them.

While I have had some difficulties getting far enough down the list to get pen to paper (figuratively, of course), there’s the OTHER reason: Any pearl of wisdom starts with a grain of sand that aggravates enough to impel one to action.

Frankly, every time that I look back to my late November post, I observe that what I recommend is what I’m still doing… this is what I’m still thinking… this is how I’m still positioning client accounts. And you know what? The market is still where it was when I wrote the post in November, about 1100 on the S&P 500.

So what’s changed? What’s the “sand in my mussel”?

Complacency. I can feel it creeping in again. I feel it when I talk to clients and prospects and I even feel it in my casual conversations. It is just these times that the general public seems to get a wake up call. Are you going to answer it?

Looking back over the last couple of months worth of posts, I’m thinking that it might appear that I’m a little opaque as to what areas of what markets you should be focusing on.

I’m not, so I’ll clear things up before I go AWOL for the week. First, understand that anything can happen over the short-term. What we always work on here in our laboratory is more macro-type thoughts for overall “big picture” positioning for ourselves and our clients. That’s what this is about.

[Sidebar... I think I might have mentioned that we are all about the "return of thought" when managing investments... That is, come up with a prospective course that we believe things will take and position for it. A little more active than reactive, and certainly not passive.]

If there’s no magic bullet or secret formula to this investing thing, the elephant in the room says that those investors who wish to survive (and thrive) in tomorrow’s markets might have to think for themselves (gasp)… or (at the very least) think for themselves enough to know they should hire those people who think for themselves.  – From “How We’re Fixing It”

First, the average inflation rate for the last 100 years or so is about 3.0%. The TIPS market (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) is showing the breakeven inflation rate at 1.9%… significantly lower than the 3.0% average. Translation: The market says that economic stimulus and other Fed stimulators (very low interest rates) will not work as planned… Translation: Extended period of very slow or non-growth. Translation: Buy TIPS because the treasury structured them to provide downside protection against deflation (which, of course the Feds assumed would never happen)… and this is really one of the very, very few investments that I can think of that offers this.

We’ve been buying the individual bonds for clients and mixing it up between 7 and 14 year maturities. If you can’t buy the individual things, you can consider the ETF (TIP)… This ETF makes sense for smaller accounts, but they have some additional internal management fees which is why we shy away from them in larger accounts

Following this premise, it wouldn’t hurt to accumulate some longer treasuries… like in the 20 year (give or take 5) range. I hear people whining about only getting 4.20% on a 20 year treasury… but I think if a person accepts what might be the ”new normal”… 4.20% might not look that bad, in hindsight.

We’re not married to holding on to the things for 20 years though. If we were presented with some outsized gains on our treasuries over the next year or two, we wouldn’t be afraid to take the profits and find a new home for the proceeds.

Dividend-spewing, old-line, consumer staples stocks look tasty for a couple of long-term reasons. First, we can get between 3 and 4% on many of these stocks (i.e. HNZ) and their business model isn’t so sensitive to the economic cycle.

Don’t get me wrong… anything and everything will go in the tank if the economy falls off a cliff again (people will even go without ketchup if things get bad). But generally, if our extended-malaise scenario becomes fact, then these consumer staples companies will still be chugging along same as always.

Just be sure to do your homework and feel comfortable that the stocks you’re choosing have low debt and decent enough margins to keep coughing up the dividend if things stay marginal for a long time. Email us if you need some help in this area.

Technically, in the stock market we’re acting a little short-term “toppy”… meaning it’s not a good time to be going after your favorite growth stock. Long-term? At the moment, none of the classic, fundamental, long-term stock market indicators are suggesting that now is a good spot to become a new “buy-and-hold” type of investor. Sorry. Be patient.

The upside to the “new normal” is that we can afford to be patient in the stock market. These days, nothing is going to run away from us for very long. No matter what the economy does, we still believe in volatility. Since volatility is how we’ve always made our money in the stock market, we still believe that there is money to be made in stocks.

As far as the thoughts of chasing stocks for fear of being left behind? We’re content to let everyone else risk heartburn while we just pick at the turkey.

Yesterday (11/19/09) on Capital Hill, Rep. Kevin Brady R-Texas got into a little a little “tiff” with Timothy Geithner (Treasury Secretary) during a Joint Economic Committee hearing.

It seems that Rep. Brady rankled Mr. Geithner a bit by insisting that he resign, blaming him for rising unemployment, growing federal deficits and accounting flaws in the number of stimulus jobs created, among other economic problems.

All of the articles that I’ve read about the exchange focused on how unusually forceful Mr. Geithner was and how hot the debate ended up getting. Included in most articles is this statement by Mr. Geithner:

“The economy fell into the worst crisis in generations after almost a decade — certainly, eight years — of basic neglect of basic public goods, in health care, in education, in public infrastructure, in how we use energy.”

Whaaaaaat?  I thought it was a credit crunch, lax regulation, an irresponsible banking system colluding with an irresponsible public piling on debt they couldn’t afford to buy things they didn’t need. Since when was the current economic crisis caused by not addressing health care? Or education? Or how we use energy?  That’s pretty far out there… even for you Tim.

Seriously, Timmy… If this is what you believe caused the economic crisis, then maybe you should step down. That kind of a statement is either simple felony stupid or reckless historical revisionism to get political points.

I was just reviewing and reorganizing my “…for further study” page and I tripped upon this quote. I had to post it again because I am still baffled and befuddled by what this means.

Maybe what it means is what he says? Is it even reasonable to postulate that our current economic conundrum is the simple result of one man’s mistaken economic theory? Could it all be that simple? 

REP. HENRY WAXMAN (D-Calif.): And my question for you is simple: Were you wrong?

ALAN GREENSPAN: And what I’m saying to you is, yes, I found a flaw….a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works, so to speak.

REP. HENRY WAXMAN: In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working?

ALAN GREENSPAN: That is–precisely. No, that’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I had been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.

Utility Stocks (as a group) have forsaken me this year by advancing only about one-fifth of the amount of the S&P 500… which can act as a real short-term boat anchor in your portfolio if you own any quantity at all. Yet, my passion for the sometimes stodgy “dividend machines” still burns hot.

Why?  First, there’s the cash flow.  My favorite utilities ETF, the Utilities Select Portfolio (XLU) is spinning off a 4.31% dividend yield in an environment where a half a percent is doin’ good on your money market. That’s worth taking a little bit of market risk.

Then there’s long term performance. The Dow Jones Utility Index has outperformed the S&P 500 by 4.4% PER YEAR over the last 10 years. This puts the DJUI in positive territory for the last 10 years, whereas the S&P 500 is down almost 20% for the same period. And we are supposed to be long term investors, right?

Then… What’s the problem? Why the dismal performance?

To answer the questions, I think we have to look at it in context of what utility stock underperformance might be saying about the economy in general. The last time we emerged from a recession, the utility averages advanced about 25% in the first year of the recovery (2003). This time, they have only advanced about 4%. My opinion is that there’s nothing wrong with utility stocks per se, but they might be telling us that there is still something wrong with the economy.

Mix this in with the failing dollar, gold hitting all-time price highs, and oil’s recent jump back to the $78 per barrel neighborhood and there’s plenty of evidence afoot to suggest that all is not “right” in the realm.

There are so many variables out there that even Helicopter Ben doesn’t have a real clue. Bernanke (at the moment) must be contented to just dump cash on the U.S. economy and hope for the best… while walking the tightrope.

We have the early indicators of inflation that gold, oil and utility stocks might be showing us on the one hand while we have the deflationary pressures that come with collapsing employment, a housing value slam with a possible double-dip and consumer spending that has all but evaporated.

So, I think utility stocks really ain’t misbehavin’… I think they’re trying to tell us something about the economy. And if I’m hearing them correctly, I think I’d rather lie with my lovable dogs (of late), than to be all loaded up on or still chasing after “recovery” stocks.