Archive

Posts Tagged ‘credit crisis’

Revisionism Anyone?

November 20th, 2009

Yesterday (11/19/09) on Capital Hill, Rep. Kevin Brady R-Texas got into a little a little “tiff” with Timothy Geithner (Treasury Secretary) during a Joint Economic Committee hearing.

It seems that Rep. Brady rankled Mr. Geithner a bit by insisting that he resign, blaming him for rising unemployment, growing federal deficits and accounting flaws in the number of stimulus jobs created, among other economic problems.

All of the articles that I’ve read about the exchange focused on how unusually forceful Mr. Geithner was and how hot the debate ended up getting. Included in most articles is this statement by Mr. Geithner:

“The economy fell into the worst crisis in generations after almost a decade — certainly, eight years — of basic neglect of basic public goods, in health care, in education, in public infrastructure, in how we use energy.”

Whaaaaaat?  I thought it was a credit crunch, lax regulation, an irresponsible banking system colluding with atimmy hurtsn irresponsible public piling on debt they couldn’t afford to buy things they didn’t need. Since when was the current economic crisis caused by not addressing health care? Or education? Or how we use energy?  That’s pretty far out there… even for you Tim.

Seriously, Timmy… If this is what you believe caused the economic crisis, then maybe you should step down. That kind of a statement is either simple felony stupid or reckless historical revisionism to get political points.

  • Share/Bookmark

I Was Wrong

October 30th, 2009

I was just reviewing and reorganizing my “…for further study” page and I tripped upon this quote. I had to post it again because I am still baffled and befuddled by what this means.

Maybe what it means is what he says? Is it even reasonable to postulate that our current economic conundrum is the simple result of one man’s mistaken economic theory? Could it all be that simple? 

REP. HENRY WAXMAN (D-Calif.): And my question for you is simple: Were you wrong?

ALAN GREENSPAN: And what I’m saying to you is, yes, I found a flaw….a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works, so to speak.

REP. HENRY WAXMAN: In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working?

ALAN GREENSPAN: That is–precisely. No, that’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I had been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.

  • Share/Bookmark

A Letter To My Friend

February 28th, 2009

Occassionally, for one reason or another I’m forced to take a moment and tame some of the squirrels that are running on the treadmills of my mind.

My most recent session was prompted by a friend who wrote me an email asking about an article she’d read. The article discusses the French Revolution and how the government ran their printing presses churning out money to the point that it destroyed their economy and precipitated a revolution.

Actually, rampant inflation is just about the one thing that the common folk just can’t take. Not only did revolution in France present the opportunity for Napoleon to jump onto the world stage, a similar situation in Germany after World War I put the German economy in such a rotten place that Hitler’s promises of prosperity at any price resonated with a desperate populace.

So, yes I think by trying to print ourselves out of the current crisis we might be putting ourselves in a precarious position… but I differ a bit from the article because I think we will probably recognize this as our next problem before anyone goes to the guillotine. The next solution becomes to raise interest rates and keep them elevated for an extended period.

I imagine that this will be necessary, but in the process it will dampen our future economic prosperity for a very long time to fight some very stuborn inflation. I feel certain that our leaders will choose this option over revolution.

Anyway, here’s the meat of my reply to her email:

Interesting… Obviously, I’ve been a huge fan of cash the past 16 months or so! It’s funny also because adding TIPS (inflation protected treasuries) is a part of my “Going Forward” plans that I’m presenting to clients next week.

As for gold… Well, I just can’t quite stomach it at $1000 per ounce… I’m feeling it’s a bit like oil at $145 per barrel last summer. Everyone said it was easily going to $200.

I look to implement a lot of the ideas from the article.  But I’m hoping to do it in a manner that doesn’t just kill my client’s prospects forever if we are wrong. Everyone’s uncomfortable right now and maybe even a little bit scared, so I don’t want to do anything too radical, no matter how rational it sounds at this moment. Sometimes these decisions and rationalizations that are made during very turbulent times end up being huge mistakes and we look back and can’t imagine how we thought such thoughts.

So, I’ll march forward incrementally. At present, I’m thinking that we’re probably looking at some serious deflation for a while and then a very muted, long term half recovery that could stretch out to a decade or so.

This leads me to a place where cash is king at the moment for most of our money. But, somewhere in the future there is going to be the opportunity, as interest rates rise, to buy these TIPS and hunker down for the possibility of some real ball-busting inflation.

Fortunately, these things usually unveil in slow motion. So slow in fact that people begin to dismiss their earlier premises and question their previous conclusions even though they are probably still correct.

As an example, I thought the housing market and the stock market were overpriced going back into late 2005. But, after another year-plus of both markets continuing to escalate, it was only reasonable that I doubted my own previous conclusions. I was right, but early. Being too early is the same as being wrong as far as our pocketbooks are concerned and I was on the edge on this one. Honestly, it coulda’ gone either way.

So this is kind of my big-picture picture. What I don’t say in the above letter is that while the economy may stagnate for the better part of a decade or more, I firmly believe that the stock and bond markets will experience continued strong rallies and significant selloffs. It’s not a longshot bet that the stock market will end up right where we are today in another decade or two.

If that’s the case, I wouldn’t want to be a “buy and hold” investor, but if you’re willing to be nimble and cynical, there’s a lot of money to be made during this whole period of economic malaise. If you need an historical precedent, go back and look at a chart of the market during the Great Depression after the initial, monster selloff. What a great time to be an investor with actual cash!

All we have to do is have some cash left at the end of the monster selloff that we find ourselves in today.

  • Share/Bookmark

Yes We Can!

February 25th, 2009

In the last two paragraphs of my last post, I chastised “The Great Orator” (BHO) for being so down in the dumps and putting forth what I feel was an excessively pessimistic view as a part of an agenda to get his stimulus package passed.

This past weekend I was sitting with my Grandson, eating Cocoa Puffs together on the sofa and watching on the boob tube the Yes We Can!kinds of stuff that appeals to your average five year old…. and that’s when I heard it… that fimiliar refrain… “Yes We Can”

That’s where BHO got it! That’s where he got it all, the chant and the building stuff about putting the American people back to work in construction jobs! This has to be the genesis, the root, the seed of the Great Economic Recovery and Ego Act: “Yes We Can!”

On a serious note: I was, in fact, a little less distraught at last night’s speech. It seemed more hopeful and “Rooseveltian” now that he’s gotten the package passed. I think the hopeful message that he put out there is a bit of the salve that Americans need at the moment.

As usual, I just wasn’t finding much substance to the whole thing. The FDR flashback is a very popular faddish image at the moment for “pseudo-economists” to grab a hold of, but the problem is that most serious students of economic history concede that FDR’s plan didn’t really work.

The market’s action since early January when the plan started to come to light seems to be saying that BHO’s plan may not work any better. Back in Roosevelt’s day, the whole world at war finally snapped us out of it. Although it worked, nobody wants that kind of a stimulus plan.

  • Share/Bookmark

Enough Already!

February 17th, 2009

OK… The world is not coming to an end already…. Yes, we have problems… Yes, they are serious… and yes, they will take years (probably many) to resolve.

We have some massive deleveraging as a country and as individuals to work through. Deleveraging is painful, whether you are a nation or a household. As we pay down debt (individually and collectively), those funds have to come from somewhere… Maybe they come from curtailing our spending, maybe we curtail our investing and saving.

If you can think about what you would do personally if you find yourself having to “de-lever”, then you know exactly what is happening with our economy. You know why spending has evaporated, why no one is buying cars, or houses, or Rolexes right now.

You see, it’s not just that credit has tightened up, it has. But, I think we have to recognize that the demand for credit has evaporated as well. It’s for this reason that I believe that simply making credit more available will not solve our problem… We all have to de-lever… pay off debt, pay down mortgages, get off the credit cards, etc.

It doesn’t matter whether you personally find yourself in the position where you must de-lever. If you don’t, your neighbor probably does and the country definitely does… and this is what matters: There’s A LOT of it that is going on.

The solution? Time. Time for Americans to do what they’ve always done: Get up in the morning, work hard and pay our bills. We will take the kids to school and soccer practice and buy a house or a car if we need it.

And we’ll do this all the while and over and over and over until the problem solves itself. It will solve itself because it will all be done with a new attitude, one of frugality and a new conciousness of the difference between a WANT and a NEED.

Maybe we can learn the lessons that our ancestors learned during the Great Depression without having to plumb the same depths of despair.selling-pencils

Frankly, what we don’t need right now is the excessive hand-wringing and scare-tactic speeches that our President has been making as a ploy to get his package passed. And we don’t need the media hype and horror stories thrown at us every single day. We get it… the economy sucks.

What we do need to do is to stop, take a deep breath, relax and to look around. Most Americans are working, have good jobs and are not in trouble with their mortgages. Most Americans are already doing what needs to be done to get us out of this thing. We’re a lot more resilient and creative than ‘they’ think we are!

  • Share/Bookmark

‘Memmer Last Septemmer?

February 10th, 2009

A couple of months before I started writing blog entries, I “looked into the abyss” on my own personal trading screens here at the office.  It was mid-September or so, right after the Fed let Lehman fail and before the significance of what just happened was really felt by anyone but a few… yet.

Early the morning of the 15th of September as I look at my screens, I’m thinking that I’m seeing a “blip”… you know, a data error, an internet outage, the ghost in the machine… whatever.

Specifically, what’s confusing is that the couple of trust preferreds that I follow (like bonds, but traded on exchanges in $25 hunks rather than the off-Broadway $1000 chunks that a regular bond trades), traded at around $15.00 or so a minute ago and now many of them are now being “bid” at an odd $.50 or so. For a few minutes, I thought the system totally freaked. After a while the 50 cent bids finally were replaced by 3 to 5 dollar bids… then up to about 7 to 8 bucks… finally settling in at about two-thirds of what was bid the day before.

Of course today, I now know it wasn’t the ghost in the machine… it was the abyss. I had looked “over the edge”. I had seen the financial “white light”.

And apparently Hank had seen it too. He met with Congress, made the talk show rounds (white as a ghost, btw) and said SOMETHING to Congress and they gave him the money. So, what was the SOMETHING that scared him so badly?

OK, so thanks to Representative Kanjorski of Pennsylvania (maybe he was talking out of school??), we’ve got a pretty decent idea what happened that day. He says that…

“On Thursday, September 15, 2008 at roughly 11 a.m., the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous draw-down of  money market accounts in the USA to the tune of $550 Billion dollars in a matter of an hour or two. Money was being removed electronically.

The treasury tried to help with $150 billion. But could not stem the tide. It was an electronic run on the banks The Treasury intervened, but, had they not closed down the accounts, they estimated that by 2 p.m. that afternoon. Within 3 hours. $5.5 trillion would have been withdrawn and collapsed within 24 hours the world economy.”

Watch the video, his explanation starts at about 2 minutes and 20 seconds into it. I also double-checked some additional congressional testimony tapes where Rep. Kanjorski questions Mr. Paulson about this very thing because I didn’t want to foist some “conspiracy theory” crap off on my loyal readers. In the tapes, Mr. Paulson does not deny what happened.

[[He also mentions that there was only the 'lone gunman' and there was no alien autopsy.... Sorry gang.]]

Now we know.

  • Share/Bookmark

Finally, A Safe Place For Your Cash

December 12th, 2008

After a record number of bank failures recently, an enterprising plumber in Florida has finally come up with a solution for where Americans can safely “bury” their cash. My thanks to The Midnight Gardener.

  • Share/Bookmark

Disclaimer:The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.