JR Snell Capital Management, LLC

Looking back over the last couple of months worth of posts, I’m thinking that it might appear that I’m a little opaque as to what areas of what markets you should be focusing on.

I’m not, so I’ll clear things up before I go AWOL for the week. First, understand that anything can happen over the short-term. What we always work on here in our laboratory is more macro-type thoughts for overall “big picture” positioning for ourselves and our clients. That’s what this is about.

[Sidebar... I think I might have mentioned that we are all about the "return of thought" when managing investments... That is, come up with a prospective course that we believe things will take and position for it. A little more active than reactive, and certainly not passive.]

If there’s no magic bullet or secret formula to this investing thing, the elephant in the room says that those investors who wish to survive (and thrive) in tomorrow’s markets might have to think for themselves (gasp)… or (at the very least) think for themselves enough to know they should hire those people who think for themselves.  – From “How We’re Fixing It”

First, the average inflation rate for the last 100 years or so is about 3.0%. The TIPS market (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) is showing the breakeven inflation rate at 1.9%… significantly lower than the 3.0% average. Translation: The market says that economic stimulus and other Fed stimulators (very low interest rates) will not work as planned… Translation: Extended period of very slow or non-growth. Translation: Buy TIPS because the treasury structured them to provide downside protection against deflation (which, of course the Feds assumed would never happen)… and this is really one of the very, very few investments that I can think of that offers this.

We’ve been buying the individual bonds for clients and mixing it up between 7 and 14 year maturities. If you can’t buy the individual things, you can consider the ETF (TIP)… This ETF makes sense for smaller accounts, but they have some additional internal management fees which is why we shy away from them in larger accounts

Following this premise, it wouldn’t hurt to accumulate some longer treasuries… like in the 20 year (give or take 5) range. I hear people whining about only getting 4.20% on a 20 year treasury… but I think if a person accepts what might be the ”new normal”… 4.20% might not look that bad, in hindsight.

We’re not married to holding on to the things for 20 years though. If we were presented with some outsized gains on our treasuries over the next year or two, we wouldn’t be afraid to take the profits and find a new home for the proceeds.

Dividend-spewing, old-line, consumer staples stocks look tasty for a couple of long-term reasons. First, we can get between 3 and 4% on many of these stocks (i.e. HNZ) and their business model isn’t so sensitive to the economic cycle.

Don’t get me wrong… anything and everything will go in the tank if the economy falls off a cliff again (people will even go without ketchup if things get bad). But generally, if our extended-malaise scenario becomes fact, then these consumer staples companies will still be chugging along same as always.

Just be sure to do your homework and feel comfortable that the stocks you’re choosing have low debt and decent enough margins to keep coughing up the dividend if things stay marginal for a long time. Email us if you need some help in this area.

Technically, in the stock market we’re acting a little short-term “toppy”… meaning it’s not a good time to be going after your favorite growth stock. Long-term? At the moment, none of the classic, fundamental, long-term stock market indicators are suggesting that now is a good spot to become a new “buy-and-hold” type of investor. Sorry. Be patient.

The upside to the “new normal” is that we can afford to be patient in the stock market. These days, nothing is going to run away from us for very long. No matter what the economy does, we still believe in volatility. Since volatility is how we’ve always made our money in the stock market, we still believe that there is money to be made in stocks.

As far as the thoughts of chasing stocks for fear of being left behind? We’re content to let everyone else risk heartburn while we just pick at the turkey.

I was just reviewing and reorganizing my “…for further study” page and I tripped upon this quote. I had to post it again because I am still baffled and befuddled by what this means.

Maybe what it means is what he says? Is it even reasonable to postulate that our current economic conundrum is the simple result of one man’s mistaken economic theory? Could it all be that simple? 

REP. HENRY WAXMAN (D-Calif.): And my question for you is simple: Were you wrong?

ALAN GREENSPAN: And what I’m saying to you is, yes, I found a flaw….a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works, so to speak.

REP. HENRY WAXMAN: In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working?

ALAN GREENSPAN: That is–precisely. No, that’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I had been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.

I’ve gotten a fair number of questions about this Roth IRA conversion that’s going to be available to all IRA owners next year.

The basics are that you will be able to convert all of your regular IRA-type accounts over to Roth IRAs during 2010, regardless of your income level. The million dollar questions is, “Is it a good idea?” … and I can’t provide an answer to that question.

So, what good am I? Well, I brought it up didn’t I? Ok… actually, I’m willing to be the “go-fer” between my clients and their accountants… but they and their accountants have the ultimate say  whether it’s a right thing to consider… that’s what good I am.

Just to get the ball rolling, I stole an article that’s got way too much detail about the whole issue… It might be confusing to us mere mortals, but your accountant will probably be interested in it. So, read – copy – print the attached article and then pass it on to your accountant.

OK, it might be just a wee-bit twisted that I sit around and think about IRA accounts… but I do. Anyway, I was thinking about IRAs last night and I wanted to remind everyone about two things with IRA accounts that are coming up.

First…

Our rich Uncle Sam, in his efforts to help soften the blow of the stock and bond mess we’ve all experienced over the last year or so, has waived the Required Minimum Distribution for 2009. I IMPLORE YOU… if you do not absolutely, positively NEED your RMD to keep the lights on, PLEASE do not take the distribution. This is a GIFT… (another) from your Rich Uncle Sam… do not look it in the mouth.

Second…

2010 is the year of the Roth IRA conversion. This can be a tricky one, but the basic difference between a Roth IRA and a regular IRA is that Roth IRAs are the opposite of regular IRAs… their contributions are not tax deductible, but their withdrawals are tax free. The catch is that there are income limits on who can contribute to a Roth IRA… so most of my clients and others who I work with demographically, we have usually not been able to throw Roth IRAs into the mix…. EXCEPT:

THE LOOPHOLE…. during 2010 ONLY, regular IRAs can be converted to Roth IRAs FOR ANY INCOME LEVEL… not just the restricted lower income limits. You will have to pay taxes on the amount converted, but that will be it forever…. No required minimum distributions, no taxes on withdrawals, no affect on your Social Security Income if you have a pretty beefy IRA account.

Given that the taxes on your IRA can also be spread out over three years (2010 ONLY, AGAIN) and the investment markets may have handed you a fairly low valuation point for conversion, this just might be the best news you’ve gotten in a while.

It’s complicated and unique to each individual’s situation, so I will be working with my clients and their accountants over the next few months to help them decide if it is right for each of them. If you are not a client and would like additional information, contact me at 480-575-7688 and I’ll hook you up with the right people.

Remember when I wrote the “Market Timing for Dummies” thing? It was in December of 2008 and my little chart that I showed in the post indicated that, at that point we’d been out of the market for a year and we might be out of it a while longer too.

Click to enlarge

We’ll, we’ve been out of the market another 8-plus months since then. Guess what? While you weren’t paying attention, we slipped into a bull market! What? Yes, it’s true… here’s the chart from almost a year ago brought up to today’s date.

Before you defrost those little wieners-on-a-toothpick that you’ve been saving for this party, here’s what it means and what I’m doing about it and what I think you should do…

Ready? Here’s the answer: “ATTITUDE SHIFT”. Since 75% of all stock price movements are in the direction of the overall market, we can begin to think that price situations will begin to resolve in our favor now, instead of assuming that everything’s going to immediately go into the crapper the instant we buy it like the last almost two years. That’s an attitude shift.

Before buying anything, make sure the financials are right and good… and that the chart looks favorable… and that you’re only putting an appropriate amount of your dough in each situation… and that you protect yourself against too much loss. (I like 10%).

As the rally continues to mature and goes through a couple of “tests” and subsequently continues to keep the wheels on, you can add to successful positions, start adding additional positions, etc. etc…. all the while limiting your risks.

So, it’s an attitude shift to where you would begin the process of investing in stocks when they look right. Moving all at once to a fully invested position could end up being a mistake if things take a sudden turn for the worse.

I remind all that you cannot predict the future.

Even I am a little surprised at this one… Here’s the quote, clipped straight out of a MarketWatch article:

Click to enlarge

Let me paraphrase my favorite part….

“You can look at all the great fundamentals in the world, but if there’s not a demand for the stock, it really doesn’t matter. I learned that point blank in the last few months.”

OK, two points… First, if the only financial thing you’ve ever done is to have a garage sale, then you know that if there’s no demand for something, it ain’t going to sell… no matter how lifelike Elvis looks on velvet.

Second, if you get all the way to chief investment officer before you figure this “no demand” thing out… and only in the last few months?? Well, I don’t even know how to explain how “squishy” that makes me feel.

Occassionally, for one reason or another I’m forced to take a moment and tame some of the squirrels that are running on the treadmills of my mind.

My most recent session was prompted by a friend who wrote me an email asking about an article she’d read. The article discusses the French Revolution and how the government ran their printing presses churning out money to the point that it destroyed their economy and precipitated a revolution.

Actually, rampant inflation is just about the one thing that the common folk just can’t take. Not only did revolution in France present the opportunity for Napoleon to jump onto the world stage, a similar situation in Germany after World War I put the German economy in such a rotten place that Hitler’s promises of prosperity at any price resonated with a desperate populace.

So, yes I think by trying to print ourselves out of the current crisis we might be putting ourselves in a precarious position… but I differ a bit from the article because I think we will probably recognize this as our next problem before anyone goes to the guillotine. The next solution becomes to raise interest rates and keep them elevated for an extended period.

I imagine that this will be necessary, but in the process it will dampen our future economic prosperity for a very long time to fight some very stuborn inflation. I feel certain that our leaders will choose this option over revolution.

Anyway, here’s the meat of my reply to her email:

Interesting… Obviously, I’ve been a huge fan of cash the past 16 months or so! It’s funny also because adding TIPS (inflation protected treasuries) is a part of my “Going Forward” plans that I’m presenting to clients next week.

As for gold… Well, I just can’t quite stomach it at $1000 per ounce… I’m feeling it’s a bit like oil at $145 per barrel last summer. Everyone said it was easily going to $200.

I look to implement a lot of the ideas from the article.  But I’m hoping to do it in a manner that doesn’t just kill my client’s prospects forever if we are wrong. Everyone’s uncomfortable right now and maybe even a little bit scared, so I don’t want to do anything too radical, no matter how rational it sounds at this moment. Sometimes these decisions and rationalizations that are made during very turbulent times end up being huge mistakes and we look back and can’t imagine how we thought such thoughts.

So, I’ll march forward incrementally. At present, I’m thinking that we’re probably looking at some serious deflation for a while and then a very muted, long term half recovery that could stretch out to a decade or so.

This leads me to a place where cash is king at the moment for most of our money. But, somewhere in the future there is going to be the opportunity, as interest rates rise, to buy these TIPS and hunker down for the possibility of some real ball-busting inflation.

Fortunately, these things usually unveil in slow motion. So slow in fact that people begin to dismiss their earlier premises and question their previous conclusions even though they are probably still correct.

As an example, I thought the housing market and the stock market were overpriced going back into late 2005. But, after another year-plus of both markets continuing to escalate, it was only reasonable that I doubted my own previous conclusions. I was right, but early. Being too early is the same as being wrong as far as our pocketbooks are concerned and I was on the edge on this one. Honestly, it coulda’ gone either way.

So this is kind of my big-picture picture. What I don’t say in the above letter is that while the economy may stagnate for the better part of a decade or more, I firmly believe that the stock and bond markets will experience continued strong rallies and significant selloffs. It’s not a longshot bet that the stock market will end up right where we are today in another decade or two.

If that’s the case, I wouldn’t want to be a “buy and hold” investor, but if you’re willing to be nimble and cynical, there’s a lot of money to be made during this whole period of economic malaise. If you need an historical precedent, go back and look at a chart of the market during the Great Depression after the initial, monster selloff. What a great time to be an investor with actual cash!

All we have to do is have some cash left at the end of the monster selloff that we find ourselves in today.

Should we have an opinion about the stock market, or even about the direction of the economy? Is it important to set a firm course of action based upon our expectations of what we think will occur in the coming months?

Most readers when asked, would think these questions a bit silly. They’re a bit silly because everyone “knows” you must have an opinion to be a successful investor. Or do you?

Of course, being who I am, I would tend to think just the opposite. Did you ever think that the investors who have a firm opinion about what they believe will occur in the future are taking a risk with their flexibility? They’re messing with an essential investing skill that is the ability to change and adapt to a very fluid and dynamic situation?

Take, for example the annual Barron’s survey from a year ago about what 12 prominent strategists thought would be the course of the economy and the market for 2008. First, not a single one of them predicted a recession even though we were already in a recession at the time of the survey (December 2007). Second, their ending estimates for the S&P 500 were between 1525 and 1750. The S&P 500 closed 2008 at 903.25. That’s an embarrassingly huge miss!

Rather than throw these collective strategists into the “idiot-pile” for their lousy foresight,  I’m more inclined to think them fools for even attempting it. And so publicly too! Oops.

Of course, it would be a bigger shame if they managed or advised others based upon an unflinching adherence to their predictions. That’s a portfolio-wrecking miscalculation and strategy. And this isn’t just one “strategist”… it’s all of them.

So, it’s pretty obvious that it’s a fool’s errand to try to predict the future for any reason, let alone the stock market. This is why it doesn’t matter what I think about the future. The good news is that when I’m stacked up against some of the greatest economists in the world, I figure I’ve got about the same odds as them as being right. The bad news is that those odds are somewhere between slim and none.

What to do?

I think that it is more important to imagine a number of potential scenarios and their corresponding courses of action. From this brainstorming session, you could put together a number of “if-then” statements, much like a computer program would be written. Then you can develop a written plan for the future of your investments in a sequence of decision statements. Maybe a statement would go something like, “If interest rates decrease to below 2%, I will sell my Treasury bill investments.” [This is not advice, only an example.]

As I advise clients and manage portfolios I’m always playing this little “game” with myself. I never make an investment for myself or others without an “if-then” rundown… and right now I’m playing it with the stock market.

Here’s the playbook from my mind at this moment:

1. IF I see that a short term rally is developing, THEN I will invest about 50% of my clients’ growth stock capital.
2. IF any of these stocks loses 10% of their value, THEN I will liquidate the position.
3. IF any of these stocks gains 30%, THEN I will exit the stock and take my (our) profits.
4. IF I see that the rally is coming to an end, THEN I will sell any of these new positions at the slightest weakness.
5. IF I see that the short term rally has turned into a new Bull market, THEN I will commit the second 50% of my client’s growth stock capital to the market.

For the record, I’m still waiting for #1 to be True. I have some other “if-thens” that I’m playing with Treasuries, Investment Grade Bonds, our Utilities Select Strategy and the Dogs of the Dow Plus Strategy but I don’t want to annoy you with the incessant squeaking from my mental squirrel cage.