JR Snell Capital Management, LLC

I usually write a letter to clients that we include with the quarterly performance reports that all clients receive. I believe, in light of recent market movements that this quarter’s letter might be of interest to a broader range of folks. Please contact us if you have any questions or you wish to begin our free Roadmap Analysis to see if you’re on track to meet your financial goals.

Dear Client,

To say that the last three months have been dramatic is to REALLY say something because it comes on the heels of a heart-stopping stock market selloff followed by a mind-bending reaction rally… the likes of which haven’t been seen since Herbert Hoover was in office.

And who could forget that that it has been only about a decade since the stock market last showed us it’s “teeth”? It’s certainly been an era to feel like one could easily get “bitten” as an investor.

Of course recently, just at the point that it feels like we deserve to have some stock and bond market stability, we are again subjected to the kind of volatility extremes that have been cropping up more and more often the last few years. Have we been shown that we’re only living in the “eye of the financial storm” at the moment?

The first quarter of 2010 seemed to come and go quietly as we moved toward ever higher highs. I jotted a web site update in mid-May as I noted that I was feeling a certain level of complacency creeping back in to investor’s attitudes about the markets. Since then I’ve also been reminded by a client of a web site update from February of 2009 in which I wrote the following…

At present, I’m thinking that we’re probably looking at some serious deflation for a while and then a very muted, long term half recovery that could stretch out to a decade or so.

This leads me to a place where cash is king at the moment for most of our money.

Fortunately, these things usually unveil in slow motion. So slow in fact that people begin to dismiss their earlier premises and question their previous conclusions even though they are probably still correct.

Could it be just that simple? Could it be that many investors have dismissed their earlier correct assumptions because it is all taking so long? Is this “thing” so massive and lumbering that it can only unfold in “slow motion”?

During the second quarter, the buzz suddenly became about sovereign debt, which we’ve known for a while was going to become a problem one day soon. It appears that “one day soon” might be nearer than we thought and the market has been asking the question, “If the rescuers need rescuing, who is left to bail out whom?”

The tacit assumption has long been that China will provide some base level of support for the balance of the world via overwhelming demand for everything in the face of an otherwise global economic slowdown. However, there’s been recent chatter about a growing housing bubble in China and speculation that this might just be “the other shoe” to drop on an otherwise fragile global economy, bringing Round Two of the Global Financial Crisis with it.

But it hasn’t been just the stock and the bond markets that have been particularly quarrelsome the past few years. It’s been downright difficult, if not treacherous being an investor in any arena. For instance, real estate did something that it has never done before: It decreased in value. Conventional wisdom had it that despite the leverage routinely used by real estate investors, it was still considered a “safe” investment because real estate prices have never, ever gone down… not even during the Great Depression. The only safe bet now is that investors will never look at real estate investments the same way again.

Other types of investments have all experienced similar difficulties: Private loans, small business loans, real estate loans and partnerships, even previously assumed long time successes such as Bernie Madoff and a host of other Ponzi-schemers that have all been discovered to be “swimming naked” the moment the money tide went out.

So, while the financial turmoil of the past couple of years wipes out or changes much of the world’s conventional wisdom, it also performs a “cleansing” that presents new opportunities with new players in a new financial landscape.

All of the turmoil of the past few years will one day pass and the opportunities will be there for those of us who refuse to focus on the past. We need to keep our focus on keeping our minds open to the new and different opportunities that most certainly will present themselves in the future… while persevering through the “creative destruction” that we find ourselves in the midst of today.

Our Current Outlook

Bill Gross of PIMCO (Pacific Investment Management Co) speaks of an economic era that we are entering that he is calling the “new normal”. In recent papers he has been going into great detail as to the justification behind his theory, but basically “new normal” means an extended period of sub-par growth throughout world economies.

A favorite theory being embraced by what I believe might be the majority of investors is this theory that some day in the not too distant future we will be wrestling with some significant inflation pressures… possibly even a stagflation situation (stagnant economy, rising prices).

Over the past year or so, I’ve been inclined to side with those that anticipate inflation, but now I am beginning to modify my view of our future world. I’m beginning to consider the possibility that our current Keynesian monetary policy of flooding the economy with money MAY NOT lead to inflationary pressures. After watching unemployment not respond to unprecedented government spending, and housing not respond to historically low interest rates, I’m starting to see the US economy and perhaps the world economy as a “leaky bucket”: We continue to pour more and more into the bucket, but it is leaking out just as quickly (or even more quickly).

What is the “leak” in the bucket? I believe the “leak” is the process of deleveraging… up and down the line… from the smallest of consumers struggling to pay off their JC Penney charge card all the way up to the nation of Greece struggling to pay down their country’s debt.

Until the world deleverages, nations can pour as much money as they want into their respective economies and still not see net economic gains. They can throw it toward bailing out the banks, or homeowners, or other countries. At the end of the day it is just moving it from one side of someone’s balance sheet to the other side of someone else’s balance sheet.

The only solution is time. We need time as individuals and as nations to deleverage ourselves. I’ve expressed my thoughts to many of you that our financial issues are “generational”… meaning that it will take a generation for them to work themselves through. For example, our exit from the housing crisis could come as a result of enough people walking away from their mortgages… but it will only transfer the debt to the bank and then to the government as the bank is again bailed out and then ultimately on to you and me in the form of higher taxes or an extended slow-growth economy. Another way to exit the housing crisis is to wait for enough people to have paid down enough of their mortgages to again be “above water” allowing normalcy to return to the housing market. I’m assuming it is to be a combination of both… but the end result is the same: It will take time. This is my version of Bill Gross’s “new normal”.

While one set of opportunities has been winding down for the last few years, a new set of opportunities has yet to reveal itself. This leaves us in a bit of a “no man’s land” in the investment landscape. But again, to simply persevere and avoid chasing “old” opportunities will insure our ability to take advantage of our as yet unseen future.

Specifically

I anticipate that US Treasury securities will continue to be our baseline method providing the ability to persevere for the next who-knows-how-long. I believe that part of the new normal involves some moderate level of deflation for the foreseeable future, allowing your purchasing power to increase even without any real investment returns.

I expect that we will continue to see extended and significant moves up and down in the stock markets… probably quite similar to what we experienced between the end of 2007, down to the March of 2009 lows and then up to the April of 2010 highs. Our opportunities in the stock market will come by accepting that there is a disconnect between the stock market and the economy and by taking advantage of the volatility that we are sure to experience because of it.

Although the market may show little to no net increase over the next decade or two, I would expect that between positioning in and out of Treasuries as appropriate and positioning in and out of equities as appropriate, our clients will continue to persevere… and quite possibly prosper.

As always, I am honored to be your guide through these historical times. Please feel free to call or email if you have any questions or need any assistance.

Jeff Snell

Managing Member, JR Snell Capital Management, LLC

If you’ve “subscribed” to get web site updates to keep one eye on the market while you do other things… this post is for you.

In my post “Market Timing for Dummies” I describe a methodology that I use to help us decide if we want to be generally in, or generally out of stocks. It’s not necessary to go into detail about the methodology of the indicator we use, as I go into it in detail here.

Click to Enlarge

Also, as a “bribe” for subscribing, you would have received a free report that describes how we use this indicator, how to calculate it and how to get it on your computer desktop for free.

If you’ve subscribed in the past and no longer have the report, please email us and we’ll send a copy. Use the Contact Us form and put in the comments that you are a subscriber to my blog and you’d like to receive a copy of the Market Timing Report.

…and if you haven’t subscribed to receive blog updates, then go here to subscribe and you’ll get a copy of the report for free.

Oh yeah… Why am I mentioning this now? Because as of Friday July 2nd, 2010, we kicked into a Bear Market according to this indicator.

Will the market crash? Will the indicator show a “false negative”? Hard to say, but rules is rules and if you’re following this indicator for some of your long term stock investments… well, it’s time to exit them for right now.

“…random.”

Not what you were expecting?  Most folks would have finished the sentence “…not an indicator of future outcomes.” Or something similar.

It’s interesting to note that nearly every investor has been so brainwashed to this statement that they don’t really ”hear” it anymore. It’s in one ear and out the other and despite the warning, most investors and advisers demonstrate their conviction that the past performance of a mutual fund DOES matter by continuing to construct financial plans, asset allocation targets and efficient frontiers around the practice of analyzing the past to predict the future.

Actually, past performance may say something about the future of a mutual fund, but not in the way one would expect. A recent Standard & Poor’s research paper titled, “Does Past Performance Matter?” points out that the bottom quartile of mutual funds by performance are consistently the most likely to go out of business, be shut down, or be bought up and merged. Logically, I can understand this. Since investors continue to focus on past performance when a fund performs poorly they are more likely to extract their money from that fund. When a fund’s outflows drain it to a certain point, it is no longer profitable to keep running the fund. Close it, sell it, merge it.

What about the best of the rest?  Here are some facts from S&P’s recent report:

1. 1.7% of large-cap funds, 2.2% of mid-cap funds, and 4.6% of small-cap funds maintained a top-half ranking over five consecutive 12-month periods. Random expectations would suggest a rate of 6.25%.
2. 18.5% of large-cap funds with a top quartile ranking over the five years ending March 2005 maintained a top quartile ranking over the next five years. Only 12.7% of mid-cap funds and 25.0% of small-cap funds maintained a top quartile performance over the same period. Random expectations would suggest a repeat rate of 25%.

The report looks at a number of different time frames and durations and IN EVERY EXAMPLE one would have achieved better investment results by randomly selecting a mutual fund.

If you turn this analysis around, the conclusion is that selecting a mutual fund to invest in by researching and ranking historical returns will actually encourage a less successful investment experience going forward than simply throwing a dart.

We’ve always avoided mutual funds for our clients because of the costs of them, now we have another reason.

The latest market meltdown has gotten folks asking me about our performance as compared to the stock market (again). But I’ve always thought a little differently about comparing our management of client accounts against various indices. (The industry calls this “benchmarking”.)

I find it interesting that investors would want to compare whole portfolio returns to the stock market. It’s funny how consumers of financial products maintain this decision bias by wanting to compare all returns “against the market” to decide if they’re getting good advice or not.

I don’t think investors are necessarily to blame for this bias… I think our industry might have brainwashed people to think this way. After being subjected to the stream of advertisements on TV and in magazines comparing “this fund” and “that fund” against the market, what can we expect investors to do when looking for intelligent ways to discern between copius financial choices?

To get market returns… or a reasonable comparison between what you’re doing versus what the market has done, you have to accept “market risk”. Yet, what I know from innumerable conversations with real people who have real concerns, investors do not want to accept “market risk” for the entirety of their investments.

I think a better “benchmark” to judge portfolio performance would be to compare your performance to what you set out to do. I call this “Personal Benchmarking”. Once you’ve released your portfolio from the chains of relative performance and embraced the concept of absolute performance (Personal Benchmarking) all investment decisions become significantly easier to make and to manage.

If you’ve planned that you’ll need a certain average annual rate of return to make your retirement work, what relevance is the stock market to you personally? It’s one of the hardest concepts to get your head around… but it’s worth it when you do… kind of Zen-like if you will.

So, we try to use the stock market as simply a tool to help us to reach your objectives. To do this, we have to first define your objectives, then we have to have the courage to “walk away” from the market when necessary and to exploit it when possible. (Hint: Get this report.)

If you REALLY think about doing things this way, you are naturally going to under perform when the market is “hot” and “risky”… and you’re going to outperform (sometimes significantly) when the market craters. But then again, who cares? The goal isn’t to “beat the market”, the goal is to continue on a track to meet your personal objectives?

Looking back over the last couple of months worth of posts, I’m thinking that it might appear that I’m a little opaque as to what areas of what markets you should be focusing on.

I’m not, so I’ll clear things up before I go AWOL for the week. First, understand that anything can happen over the short-term. What we always work on here in our laboratory is more macro-type thoughts for overall “big picture” positioning for ourselves and our clients. That’s what this is about.

[Sidebar... I think I might have mentioned that we are all about the "return of thought" when managing investments... That is, come up with a prospective course that we believe things will take and position for it. A little more active than reactive, and certainly not passive.]

If there’s no magic bullet or secret formula to this investing thing, the elephant in the room says that those investors who wish to survive (and thrive) in tomorrow’s markets might have to think for themselves (gasp)… or (at the very least) think for themselves enough to know they should hire those people who think for themselves.  – From “How We’re Fixing It”

First, the average inflation rate for the last 100 years or so is about 3.0%. The TIPS market (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) is showing the breakeven inflation rate at 1.9%… significantly lower than the 3.0% average. Translation: The market says that economic stimulus and other Fed stimulators (very low interest rates) will not work as planned… Translation: Extended period of very slow or non-growth. Translation: Buy TIPS because the treasury structured them to provide downside protection against deflation (which, of course the Feds assumed would never happen)… and this is really one of the very, very few investments that I can think of that offers this.

We’ve been buying the individual bonds for clients and mixing it up between 7 and 14 year maturities. If you can’t buy the individual things, you can consider the ETF (TIP)… This ETF makes sense for smaller accounts, but they have some additional internal management fees which is why we shy away from them in larger accounts

Following this premise, it wouldn’t hurt to accumulate some longer treasuries… like in the 20 year (give or take 5) range. I hear people whining about only getting 4.20% on a 20 year treasury… but I think if a person accepts what might be the ”new normal”… 4.20% might not look that bad, in hindsight.

We’re not married to holding on to the things for 20 years though. If we were presented with some outsized gains on our treasuries over the next year or two, we wouldn’t be afraid to take the profits and find a new home for the proceeds.

Dividend-spewing, old-line, consumer staples stocks look tasty for a couple of long-term reasons. First, we can get between 3 and 4% on many of these stocks (i.e. HNZ) and their business model isn’t so sensitive to the economic cycle.

Don’t get me wrong… anything and everything will go in the tank if the economy falls off a cliff again (people will even go without ketchup if things get bad). But generally, if our extended-malaise scenario becomes fact, then these consumer staples companies will still be chugging along same as always.

Just be sure to do your homework and feel comfortable that the stocks you’re choosing have low debt and decent enough margins to keep coughing up the dividend if things stay marginal for a long time. Email us if you need some help in this area.

Technically, in the stock market we’re acting a little short-term “toppy”… meaning it’s not a good time to be going after your favorite growth stock. Long-term? At the moment, none of the classic, fundamental, long-term stock market indicators are suggesting that now is a good spot to become a new “buy-and-hold” type of investor. Sorry. Be patient.

The upside to the “new normal” is that we can afford to be patient in the stock market. These days, nothing is going to run away from us for very long. No matter what the economy does, we still believe in volatility. Since volatility is how we’ve always made our money in the stock market, we still believe that there is money to be made in stocks.

As far as the thoughts of chasing stocks for fear of being left behind? We’re content to let everyone else risk heartburn while we just pick at the turkey.

Utility Stocks (as a group) have forsaken me this year by advancing only about one-fifth of the amount of the S&P 500… which can act as a real short-term boat anchor in your portfolio if you own any quantity at all. Yet, my passion for the sometimes stodgy “dividend machines” still burns hot.

Why?  First, there’s the cash flow.  My favorite utilities ETF, the Utilities Select Portfolio (XLU) is spinning off a 4.31% dividend yield in an environment where a half a percent is doin’ good on your money market. That’s worth taking a little bit of market risk.

Then there’s long term performance. The Dow Jones Utility Index has outperformed the S&P 500 by 4.4% PER YEAR over the last 10 years. This puts the DJUI in positive territory for the last 10 years, whereas the S&P 500 is down almost 20% for the same period. And we are supposed to be long term investors, right?

Then… What’s the problem? Why the dismal performance?

To answer the questions, I think we have to look at it in context of what utility stock underperformance might be saying about the economy in general. The last time we emerged from a recession, the utility averages advanced about 25% in the first year of the recovery (2003). This time, they have only advanced about 4%. My opinion is that there’s nothing wrong with utility stocks per se, but they might be telling us that there is still something wrong with the economy.

Mix this in with the failing dollar, gold hitting all-time price highs, and oil’s recent jump back to the $78 per barrel neighborhood and there’s plenty of evidence afoot to suggest that all is not “right” in the realm.

There are so many variables out there that even Helicopter Ben doesn’t have a real clue. Bernanke (at the moment) must be contented to just dump cash on the U.S. economy and hope for the best… while walking the tightrope.

We have the early indicators of inflation that gold, oil and utility stocks might be showing us on the one hand while we have the deflationary pressures that come with collapsing employment, a housing value slam with a possible double-dip and consumer spending that has all but evaporated.

So, I think utility stocks really ain’t misbehavin’… I think they’re trying to tell us something about the economy. And if I’m hearing them correctly, I think I’d rather lie with my lovable dogs (of late), than to be all loaded up on or still chasing after “recovery” stocks.

OK, it might be just a wee-bit twisted that I sit around and think about IRA accounts… but I do. Anyway, I was thinking about IRAs last night and I wanted to remind everyone about two things with IRA accounts that are coming up.

First…

Our rich Uncle Sam, in his efforts to help soften the blow of the stock and bond mess we’ve all experienced over the last year or so, has waived the Required Minimum Distribution for 2009. I IMPLORE YOU… if you do not absolutely, positively NEED your RMD to keep the lights on, PLEASE do not take the distribution. This is a GIFT… (another) from your Rich Uncle Sam… do not look it in the mouth.

Second…

2010 is the year of the Roth IRA conversion. This can be a tricky one, but the basic difference between a Roth IRA and a regular IRA is that Roth IRAs are the opposite of regular IRAs… their contributions are not tax deductible, but their withdrawals are tax free. The catch is that there are income limits on who can contribute to a Roth IRA… so most of my clients and others who I work with demographically, we have usually not been able to throw Roth IRAs into the mix…. EXCEPT:

THE LOOPHOLE…. during 2010 ONLY, regular IRAs can be converted to Roth IRAs FOR ANY INCOME LEVEL… not just the restricted lower income limits. You will have to pay taxes on the amount converted, but that will be it forever…. No required minimum distributions, no taxes on withdrawals, no affect on your Social Security Income if you have a pretty beefy IRA account.

Given that the taxes on your IRA can also be spread out over three years (2010 ONLY, AGAIN) and the investment markets may have handed you a fairly low valuation point for conversion, this just might be the best news you’ve gotten in a while.

It’s complicated and unique to each individual’s situation, so I will be working with my clients and their accountants over the next few months to help them decide if it is right for each of them. If you are not a client and would like additional information, contact me at 480-575-7688 and I’ll hook you up with the right people.

Even I am a little surprised at this one… Here’s the quote, clipped straight out of a MarketWatch article:

Click to enlarge

Let me paraphrase my favorite part….

“You can look at all the great fundamentals in the world, but if there’s not a demand for the stock, it really doesn’t matter. I learned that point blank in the last few months.”

OK, two points… First, if the only financial thing you’ve ever done is to have a garage sale, then you know that if there’s no demand for something, it ain’t going to sell… no matter how lifelike Elvis looks on velvet.

Second, if you get all the way to chief investment officer before you figure this “no demand” thing out… and only in the last few months?? Well, I don’t even know how to explain how “squishy” that makes me feel.

Occassionally, for one reason or another I’m forced to take a moment and tame some of the squirrels that are running on the treadmills of my mind.

My most recent session was prompted by a friend who wrote me an email asking about an article she’d read. The article discusses the French Revolution and how the government ran their printing presses churning out money to the point that it destroyed their economy and precipitated a revolution.

Actually, rampant inflation is just about the one thing that the common folk just can’t take. Not only did revolution in France present the opportunity for Napoleon to jump onto the world stage, a similar situation in Germany after World War I put the German economy in such a rotten place that Hitler’s promises of prosperity at any price resonated with a desperate populace.

So, yes I think by trying to print ourselves out of the current crisis we might be putting ourselves in a precarious position… but I differ a bit from the article because I think we will probably recognize this as our next problem before anyone goes to the guillotine. The next solution becomes to raise interest rates and keep them elevated for an extended period.

I imagine that this will be necessary, but in the process it will dampen our future economic prosperity for a very long time to fight some very stuborn inflation. I feel certain that our leaders will choose this option over revolution.

Anyway, here’s the meat of my reply to her email:

Interesting… Obviously, I’ve been a huge fan of cash the past 16 months or so! It’s funny also because adding TIPS (inflation protected treasuries) is a part of my “Going Forward” plans that I’m presenting to clients next week.

As for gold… Well, I just can’t quite stomach it at $1000 per ounce… I’m feeling it’s a bit like oil at $145 per barrel last summer. Everyone said it was easily going to $200.

I look to implement a lot of the ideas from the article.  But I’m hoping to do it in a manner that doesn’t just kill my client’s prospects forever if we are wrong. Everyone’s uncomfortable right now and maybe even a little bit scared, so I don’t want to do anything too radical, no matter how rational it sounds at this moment. Sometimes these decisions and rationalizations that are made during very turbulent times end up being huge mistakes and we look back and can’t imagine how we thought such thoughts.

So, I’ll march forward incrementally. At present, I’m thinking that we’re probably looking at some serious deflation for a while and then a very muted, long term half recovery that could stretch out to a decade or so.

This leads me to a place where cash is king at the moment for most of our money. But, somewhere in the future there is going to be the opportunity, as interest rates rise, to buy these TIPS and hunker down for the possibility of some real ball-busting inflation.

Fortunately, these things usually unveil in slow motion. So slow in fact that people begin to dismiss their earlier premises and question their previous conclusions even though they are probably still correct.

As an example, I thought the housing market and the stock market were overpriced going back into late 2005. But, after another year-plus of both markets continuing to escalate, it was only reasonable that I doubted my own previous conclusions. I was right, but early. Being too early is the same as being wrong as far as our pocketbooks are concerned and I was on the edge on this one. Honestly, it coulda’ gone either way.

So this is kind of my big-picture picture. What I don’t say in the above letter is that while the economy may stagnate for the better part of a decade or more, I firmly believe that the stock and bond markets will experience continued strong rallies and significant selloffs. It’s not a longshot bet that the stock market will end up right where we are today in another decade or two.

If that’s the case, I wouldn’t want to be a “buy and hold” investor, but if you’re willing to be nimble and cynical, there’s a lot of money to be made during this whole period of economic malaise. If you need an historical precedent, go back and look at a chart of the market during the Great Depression after the initial, monster selloff. What a great time to be an investor with actual cash!

All we have to do is have some cash left at the end of the monster selloff that we find ourselves in today.

OK… The world is not coming to an end already…. Yes, we have problems… Yes, they are serious… and yes, they will take years (probably many) to resolve.

We have some massive deleveraging as a country and as individuals to work through. Deleveraging is painful, whether you are a nation or a household. As we pay down debt (individually and collectively), those funds have to come from somewhere… Maybe they come from curtailing our spending, maybe we curtail our investing and saving.

If you can think about what you would do personally if you find yourself having to “de-lever”, then you know exactly what is happening with our economy. You know why spending has evaporated, why no one is buying cars, or houses, or Rolexes right now.

You see, it’s not just that credit has tightened up, it has. But, I think we have to recognize that the demand for credit has evaporated as well. It’s for this reason that I believe that simply making credit more available will not solve our problem… We all have to de-lever… pay off debt, pay down mortgages, get off the credit cards, etc.

It doesn’t matter whether you personally find yourself in the position where you must de-lever. If you don’t, your neighbor probably does and the country definitely does… and this is what matters: There’s A LOT of it that is going on.

The solution? Time. Time for Americans to do what they’ve always done: Get up in the morning, work hard and pay our bills. We will take the kids to school and soccer practice and buy a house or a car if we need it.

And we’ll do this all the while and over and over and over until the problem solves itself. It will solve itself because it will all be done with a new attitude, one of frugality and a new conciousness of the difference between a WANT and a NEED.

Maybe we can learn the lessons that our ancestors learned during the Great Depression without having to plumb the same depths of despair.

Frankly, what we don’t need right now is the excessive hand-wringing and scare-tactic speeches that our President has been making as a ploy to get his package passed. And we don’t need the media hype and horror stories thrown at us every single day. We get it… the economy sucks.

What we do need to do is to stop, take a deep breath, relax and to look around. Most Americans are working, have good jobs and are not in trouble with their mortgages. Most Americans are already doing what needs to be done to get us out of this thing. We’re a lot more resilient and creative than ‘they’ think we are!