If you’ve “subscribed” to get web site updates to keep one eye on the market while you do other things… this post is for you.
In my post “Market Timing for Dummies” I describe a methodology that I use to help us decide if we want to be generally in, or generally out of stocks. It’s not necessary to go into detail about the methodology of the indicator we use, as I go into it in detail here.
Click to Enlarge
Also, as a “bribe” for subscribing, you would have received a free report that describes how we use this indicator, how to calculate it and how to get it on your computer desktop for free.
If you’ve subscribed in the past and no longer have the report, please email us and we’ll send a copy. Use the Contact Us form and put in the comments that you are a subscriber to my blog and you’d like to receive a copy of the Market Timing Report.
…and if you haven’t subscribed to receive blog updates, then go here to subscribe and you’ll get a copy of the report for free.
Oh yeah… Why am I mentioning this now? Because as of Friday July 2nd, 2010, we kicked into a Bear Market according to this indicator.
Will the market crash? Will the indicator show a “false negative”? Hard to say, but rules is rules and if you’re following this indicator for some of your long term stock investments… well, it’s time to exit them for right now.
I was just reviewing and reorganizing my “…for further study” page and I tripped upon this quote. I had to post it again because I am still baffled and befuddled by what this means.
Maybe what it means is what he says? Is it even reasonable to postulate that our current economic conundrum is the simple result of one man’s mistaken economic theory? Could it all be that simple?
REP. HENRY WAXMAN (D-Calif.): And my question for you is simple: Were you wrong?
ALAN GREENSPAN: And what I’m saying to you is, yes, I found a flaw….a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works, so to speak.
REP. HENRY WAXMAN: In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working?
ALAN GREENSPAN: That is–precisely. No, that’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I had been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.
Even I am a little surprised at this one… Here’s the quote, clipped straight out of a MarketWatch article:
Click to enlarge
Let me paraphrase my favorite part….
“You can look at all the great fundamentals in the world, but if there’s not a demand for the stock, it really doesn’t matter. I learned that point blank in the last few months.”
OK, two points… First, if the only financial thing you’ve ever done is to have a garage sale, then you know that if there’s no demand for something, it ain’t going to sell… no matter how lifelike Elvis looks on velvet.
Second, if you get all the way to chief investment officer before you figure this “no demand” thing out… and only in the last few months?? Well, I don’t even know how to explain how “squishy” that makes me feel.
For everyone who is anxiously awaiting a new “buy” signal for the stock market, I still have no news. Things, believe it or not, are about the same as my last post about market timing. For the more technically-oriented investors… or those that feel like they need a little more detail about the “whys” of what’s happening at the moment, here is the complete description of exactly where we are.
Click to enlarge
The situation at present is that we have broken a minor, valid downtrend line (yellow downtrend line) and then gone on to form a couple of minor, higher lows (green up arrows). Recently, we’ve hit our heads on the 10 week moving average (blue line). The last time that this happened, it spelled trouble for the markets (yellow down arrows).
Today’s million dollar question is how this will resolve. Are we setting up for another leg down or will we hold the line and ultimately move higher? As it is right now, I can say that we are firmly on the fence.
Also, don’t forget that I’m talking about a short to intermediate term possible turnaround here. Everything needs to be considered in the context of an overall bear market as I have been discussing.
I’ll let you know when that changes.
Mug Shot of Charles Ponzi
Mug Shot of Arthur Fonzie
As the Madoff situation continues to ripple through the investing world, I’m absolutely personally incredulous that some VERY sophisticated investors simply put on the blinders to another investment that was “too good to be true”… and probably definitely was.
This investing “thing” is difficult… very difficult… I mean VERY VERY VERY DIFFICULT. This idea that someone, somewhere has a “secret”, or a magic touch, or the ability to defy the odds… well, it’s not possible, never has been possible and never will be possible. If someone is showing you an investment that can’t lose, or has never lost, or will never lose… they are telling you that they have defied the laws of physics. Be smart and know this isn’t possible.
Mug Shot of Bernie Madoff?
This seems a good time to trot out something that I wrote a number of years ago that is a part of my “Personal Prospectus”, which is a document that I give to all potential new clients:
Ripping Off Investors
When you read in the paper about investors getting ripped off by a scam artist running a Ponzi scheme and you wonder about how it happened and how anyone could be so “gullible”, here’s your answer: Promises of outsized returns and impossibly unsustainable income projections should immediately sound off all kinds of alarms and warnings in the head of any investor with at least a little tertiary knowledge of what is real and realistic in the investment arena. Those who get ripped off are usually those that refuse to do their homework.
The old adage, “If it seems to good to be true, it probably is”, is more true in the investment business than in any other situation you are likely to come across. Trust me when I tell you that nobody cares about your money more than you do.
Here’s what really blows my mind… The amount that Mr. Madoff just made off with is more than enough to bail out all three of The Big Three automakers. Not that Florida retirees should’a bailed out The Big Three, I’m just saying they could’a.
