It may have escaped the short memory of the investment world that the credit rating agencies were one of the key pillars that crumbled under the weight of the financial debacle that they helped create. You will recall that it was their admitted ignorance or understatement of the risks associated with securitized mortgages that led to a mass downgrade of billions of dollars of mortgage securities and triggered the collapse.

Expertise we can count On?

The subject of this recent mis-analysis were re-remics, a securitized mortgage instrument (here we go again) comprised of repackaged mortgaged back securities that managed to survive the latest rounds of defaults. This re-rating comes right on the heels of another one that occurred just 3 months ago with aother batch of 224 re-remics.

Most disturbing is the fresh light this casts on the questionable objectivity of the rating agencies which are highly compensated for their ratings, but only after winning the business by outbidding each other. Apparently, rating re-remics commands a much higher fee and the banks are willing to pay it to get the ratings they need to be able to market the securities.

Lessons for the Taking

Individual investors can, hopefully, take away some lessons from the lessons that weren’t learned by the ratings agencies and the banks.

• First, we have no business investing in financial instruments that we don’t completely understand, especially ones that require some sort of engineering by backroom financial geeks. Seriously? When the rating agencies don’t understand them enough to develop the right methods for analyzing them, it’s time to run; run far away.

• Second, even though the loss that the banks that are holding these re-remics won’t amount to more than a blip on their balance sheets, it’s a reminder to the rest of us “sophisticated” investors that proper diversification is key in the face of these human-caused flare-ups that could possibly trigger the next calamity.

• Third, unless you have some sort of twisted financial death wish, stick to the fundamental tools. The “next big thing” in investments is usually a re-hashed, raked over financial product loaded with fees and back-door profits intended to enrich the promoters with little regard for your financial future.

None other than the notorious stock trader, Jesse Livermore, stated it the best, “Another lesson I learned early is that there is nothing new in Wall Street…Whatever happens in the stock market today has happened before and will happen again.”

The big takeaway here  is that in successful investing, there are no crutches, no models, no experts, and there are no short cuts.  With experts like S & P, it’s more important than ever to be able to think for yourself and move deliberately along your own course.

It’s a tough read for a couple of reasons… it’s very thick (over 700 pages) and it’s written in the style that folks used back in 1841. For me, it takes a lot of concentration to read and comprehend just because the style is so foreign to our contemporary way.

Nonetheless, it’s an important book and details a number of historical speculative bubbles. By recommending and discussing the book for clients, I am leaving a couple of messages… First, it’s human nature and second, it’s nothing new.

The NY Times has now recently published an article that demonstrates that there is a chemical reaction that occurs in our brains that makes us “feel good” when prices are running up speculatively.

But according to the article, while dopamine is flowing freely and generously for most of the run-up, the dopamine STOPS firing as we hit the more “bubble” phase of the run-up (the last phase).

The chemical changes might be that “little voice” or a general feeling of uneasiness about overall conditions. But, because of what’s called the “Country Club Effect”, nearly everyone ignores “the little voice” much to their later chagrin.

Many times successful investing seems to be having the ability to heed the warnings of that “little voice” instead of allowing your rational mind to convince you otherwise.

Now it seems that there’s a rational explanation for why the smart decision sometimes appears to be the irrational decision. Hmmm, interesting.

In my post “Market Timing for Dummies” I describe a methodology that I use to help us decide if we want to be generally in, or generally out of stocks. It’s not necessary to go into detail about the methodology of the indicator we use, as I go into it in detail here.

Click to Enlarge

Also, as a “bribe” for subscribing, you would have received a free report that describes how we use this indicator, how to calculate it and how to get it on your computer desktop for free.

If you’ve subscribed in the past and no longer have the report, please email us and we’ll send a copy. Use the Contact Us form and put in the comments that you are a subscriber to my blog and you’d like to receive a copy of the Market Timing Report.

…and if you haven’t subscribed to receive blog updates, then go here to subscribe and you’ll get a copy of the report for free.

Oh yeah… Why am I mentioning this now? Because as of Friday July 2nd, 2010, we kicked into a Bear Market according to this indicator.

Will the market crash? Will the indicator show a “false negative”? Hard to say, but rules is rules and if you’re following this indicator for some of your long term stock investments… well, it’s time to exit them for right now.

Ahh priorities… Clients always get first whack at my time. I might be on the more  “public” tasks of preparing annual reports, quarterly reports, talking to accountants, compiling year-end numbers, or working on each client’s annual Roadmap planning updates.

Or, I might be on the more “in house” tasks of balancing or rebalancing client accounts, analyzing stock positions, considering stock positions, research, trading into or out of something that I like or don’t like, etc.

These two priorities have kept me pretty busy… end of year and most recently end of quarter stuff… But, I’ve also been busy with my second course of action, which is helping new people to become new clients. Since I really take my time with their stuff and all new clients go through the process of figuring out where they are and where they want to be, this can take a lot of time.

After all of this, comes time for blatant self promotion and article-writing… which includes sitting back (a little… not enough to tip over my chair) and observing the world of the markets with a fresh enough eye to comment on them.

While I have had some difficulties getting far enough down the list to get pen to paper (figuratively, of course), there’s the OTHER reason: Any pearl of wisdom starts with a grain of sand that aggravates enough to impel one to action.

Frankly, every time that I look back to my late November post, I observe that what I recommend is what I’m still doing… this is what I’m still thinking… this is how I’m still positioning client accounts. And you know what? The market is still where it was when I wrote the post in November, about 1100 on the S&P 500.

So what’s changed? What’s the “sand in my mussel”?

Complacency. I can feel it creeping in again. I feel it when I talk to clients and prospects and I even feel it in my casual conversations. It is just these times that the general public seems to get a wake up call. Are you going to answer it?

Why?  First, there’s the cash flow.  My favorite utilities ETF, the Utilities Select Portfolio (XLU) is spinning off a 4.31% dividend yield in an environment where a half a percent is doin’ good on your money market. That’s worth taking a little bit of market risk.

Then there’s long term performance. The Dow Jones Utility Index has outperformed the S&P 500 by 4.4% PER YEAR over the last 10 years. This puts the DJUI in positive territory for the last 10 years, whereas the S&P 500 is down almost 20% for the same period. And we are supposed to be long term investors, right?

Then… What’s the problem? Why the dismal performance?

To answer the questions, I think we have to look at it in context of what utility stock underperformance might be saying about the economy in general. The last time we emerged from a recession, the utility averages advanced about 25% in the first year of the recovery (2003). This time, they have only advanced about 4%. My opinion is that there’s nothing wrong with utility stocks per se, but they might be telling us that there is still something wrong with the economy.

Mix this in with the failing dollar, gold hitting all-time price highs, and oil’s recent jump back to the $78 per barrel neighborhood and there’s plenty of evidence afoot to suggest that all is not “right” in the realm.

There are so many variables out there that even Helicopter Ben doesn’t have a real clue. Bernanke (at the moment) must be contented to just dump cash on the U.S. economy and hope for the best… while walking the tightrope.

We have the early indicators of inflation that gold, oil and utility stocks might be showing us on the one hand while we have the deflationary pressures that come with collapsing employment, a housing value slam with a possible double-dip and consumer spending that has all but evaporated.

So, I think utility stocks really ain’t misbehavin’… I think they’re trying to tell us something about the economy. And if I’m hearing them correctly, I think I’d rather lie with my lovable dogs (of late), than to be all loaded up on or still chasing after “recovery” stocks.

Most readers when asked, would think these questions a bit silly. They’re a bit silly because everyone “knows” you must have an opinion to be a successful investor. Or do you?

Of course, being who I am, I would tend to think just the opposite. Did you ever think that the investors who have a firm opinion about what they believe will occur in the future are taking a risk with their flexibility? They’re messing with an essential investing skill that is the ability to change and adapt to a very fluid and dynamic situation?

Take, for example the annual Barron’s survey from a year ago about what 12 prominent strategists thought would be the course of the economy and the market for 2008. First, not a single one of them predicted a recession even though we were already in a recession at the time of the survey (December 2007). Second, their ending estimates for the S&P 500 were between 1525 and 1750. The S&P 500 closed 2008 at 903.25. That’s an embarrassingly huge miss!

Rather than throw these collective strategists into the “idiot-pile” for their lousy foresight,  I’m more inclined to think them fools for even attempting it. And so publicly too! Oops.

Of course, it would be a bigger shame if they managed or advised others based upon an unflinching adherence to their predictions. That’s a portfolio-wrecking miscalculation and strategy. And this isn’t just one “strategist”… it’s all of them.

So, it’s pretty obvious that it’s a fool’s errand to try to predict the future for any reason, let alone the stock market. This is why it doesn’t matter what I think about the future. The good news is that when I’m stacked up against some of the greatest economists in the world, I figure I’ve got about the same odds as them as being right. The bad news is that those odds are somewhere between slim and none.

What to do?

I think that it is more important to imagine a number of potential scenarios and their corresponding courses of action. From this brainstorming session, you could put together a number of “if-then” statements, much like a computer program would be written. Then you can develop a written plan for the future of your investments in a sequence of decision statements. Maybe a statement would go something like, “If interest rates decrease to below 2%, I will sell my Treasury bill investments.” [This is not advice, only an example.]

As I advise clients and manage portfolios I’m always playing this little “game” with myself. I never make an investment for myself or others without an “if-then” rundown… and right now I’m playing it with the stock market.

Here’s the playbook from my mind at this moment:

1. IF I see that a short term rally is developing, THEN I will invest about 50% of my clients’ growth stock capital.
2. IF any of these stocks loses 10% of their value, THEN I will liquidate the position.
3. IF any of these stocks gains 30%, THEN I will exit the stock and take my (our) profits.
4. IF I see that the rally is coming to an end, THEN I will sell any of these new positions at the slightest weakness.
5. IF I see that the short term rally has turned into a new Bull market, THEN I will commit the second 50% of my client’s growth stock capital to the market.

For the record, I’m still waiting for #1 to be True. I have some other “if-thens” that I’m playing with Treasuries, Investment Grade Bonds, our Utilities Select Strategy and the Dogs of the Dow Plus Strategy but I don’t want to annoy you with the incessant squeaking from my mental squirrel cage.

Click to enlarge

The situation at present is that we have broken a minor, valid downtrend line (yellow downtrend line) and then gone on to form a couple of minor, higher lows (green up arrows). Recently, we’ve hit our heads on the 10 week moving average (blue line). The last time that this happened, it spelled trouble for the markets (yellow down arrows).

Today’s million dollar question is how this will resolve. Are we setting up for another leg down or will we hold the line and ultimately move higher? As it is right now, I can say that we are firmly on the fence.

Also, don’t forget that I’m talking about a short to intermediate term possible turnaround here. Everything needs to be considered in the context of an overall bear market as I have been discussing.

I’ll let you know when that changes.