Jeff Snell

Are You Ready to Retire? That Depends – NBC News.com

Lifestyle, Retirement

If you have socked away money in a 401(k) and your 60th birthday is behind you, chances are you are thinking about when to retire.

Chances are, too, that you are planning to retire sooner rather than later. The average retirement age seems to have stabilized at 62 for women and 64 for men, according to new research from Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research. But retiring too young can be very harmful to your financial health, the study found, and older workers would do well to hang in a bit longer.

Continuing to work reduces the amount of time when people need to live on their savings. It can also lead to more guaranteed retirement income. “An individual who delays claiming Social Security from age 62 to age 70 receives a monthly benefit that is 76 percent higher,” said Alicia Munnell, director of the center.

The retirement age is stabilizing largely because the forces pushing it higher have been played out. Consider the shift in retirement plans, for example. In 1979, 74 percent of workers participating in retirement plans had a defined benefit pension that would provide a fixed income stream, according to Labor Department data.

As more workers became responsible for generating their own retirement income through 401(k) accounts and the like, older workers started putting off retirement. The center found that workforce participation rates for men and women age 55 to 64 started gradually increasing in the mid-1980s.

“Studies show that workers covered by 401(k) plans retire a year or two later on average than similarly situated workers covered by a defined benefit plan,” the study found.

Read more…

Are You Ready to Retire? That Depends – NBC News.com.

Are You Ready to Retire? That Depends – NBC News.com Read Post »

Death By Golf: Why Retirement Is a Bankrupt Industrial Age Idea | Inc.com

Lifestyle, Retirement

death plays golfDeath By Golf: Why Retirement Is a Bankrupt Industrial Age Idea | Inc.com.

Retirement was invented by Otto von Bismarck in 1889 to get old people off the machines and out of the way. But exhaustive research now shows it’s not what it’s cracked up to be.

BY CHUCK BLAKEMAN

Founder, Crankset Group@ChuckBlakeman

A 90-year study of 1,528 Americans called The Longevity Project shoots holes in the retirement dream. Turns out goofing off for the last thirty years of our lives is a really bad idea. The idea that work is leading you to an early grave is a myth. This massive study proved what some of us have been saying for years now.

Know where you’re going.

People with the most focused long-term paths in the study were the least likely to die young. Looking at the participants in the study who were in their 70s, those that had not retired were looking at much longer lives than their golfing counterparts: “The continually productive men and women lived much longer than their laid-back comrades.”

Also, those who moved from job to job without a clear progression were less likely to have long lives than those who went deep and long in a focused direction with their business lives. We call this commitment to the long term, “conation”.

Conate, You’ll Live Longer.

Conation is the most important business word you’ve never heard, but is central to a long life. We define conation as, “Committed Movement in a Purposeful Direction.”

“It wasn’t the happiest or the most relaxed older participants who lived the longest,” the authors write, “It was those who were most engaged in pursuing their goals.”

Knowing where you’re going, and being committed and focused to get there (conation), is going to make you live longer.

Conation–Committed Movement in a Purposeful Direction.

Live With Purpose, Not Just to Play.

This study doesn’t mean you need to go to work for 90 years. It means you need to rethink going out to pasture at 65 to play golf. Amusement isn’t the goal. Think of the Latin roots of that word–“a” means “without”, and “muse” means “to think”.

Amusement–something you do without your brain.

Make Meaning

A commitment to a life of retirement leisure is a great way to die sooner. You don’t have to go to work; you just need to figure out how to continue to Make Meaning, even if you’re done making money.

Retirement is a bankrupt Industrial Age idea. Live a life of significance your whole life, not just the first two thirds of it.

Conate. You’ll live longer.

Death By Golf: Why Retirement Is a Bankrupt Industrial Age Idea | Inc.com Read Post »

5 Giant Myths Of Retirement Planning – Forbes

Retirement

By Marc S. Freedman, Next Avenue Contributor

(This article was adapted from Retiring for the GENIUS by Marc S. Freedman.)

Some myths become legend, and once they reach that level of status, it’s tough to shake them from their perch. The world of retirement planning is no different. These are five myths that still exist in retirement planning:

1. Don’t touch the principal — live off the interest. It’s been more than two decades since retirees could comfortably consider retiring off the interest they earned at the bank.

Today, you need to take a more sophisticated look at your overall financial life. If not, you’ll find yourself living a life of scarcity when your retirement life could be filled with abundance. Consider taking a total-return approach as a mechanism for creating an income stream. Essentially, that means building an investment portfolio that leaves roughly 5 to 8% of your investable assets in cash. Once a month, you have a check for a predetermined amount electronically withdrawn from the cash account and deposited into your checking account. As the cash portion of your portfolio depletes to 3 to 5% of the value, you rebalance the portfolio and replenish the cash account.

2. The more a financial plan weighs, the more valuable it is. When my father first started in the financial planning business, he joked that financial planning was delivered by the pound. Financial institutions would battle over who had the most attractive, heaviest, most premium leather binder to provide a client. But in truth, most pages were boilerplate filler.

Today’s financial plans are living documents. Generally, they are introduced with a three- to five-page executive summary that highlights your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The report is supplemented with eight to 12 pages of high-level analysis and reports. The last page features an “action plan” that lists steps you should consider taking to better position yourself for retirement success.

All this data is then made available through a cloud-based software system where you (and, if necessary, your adviser) can monitor the progress of your plan and keep you on track.

3. My life is simple and I have a will — that’s all I need. I’m always amazed by how unprepared people are when a loved one (especially a spouse or parent) passes away. Without proper planning, the days following a death can be disastrous and not the way the deceased had planned.

No, I’m not talking about the division of assets and who inherits which jewelry. It starts with someone, other than the deceased, knowing where instructions are pertaining to the funeral, cemetery and final wishes.

Many people elect to keep end-of-life instructions in a safe deposit box. Yet if you haven’t given anybody instructions on where to find the key and/or who has authority to open the box, your wishes may not be fulfilled.

No matter how simple a life you lead, or how basic you’d like your funeral to be, it’s important that your instructions be clearly noted and that someone knows where those notes exist. Finally, I recommend having your personally written wishes notarized.

4. A surviving spouse will honor the way the deceased spouse managed money. With you gone, your spouse’s life will change. For a short time, your spouse may wonder, “What would Irving do?” or “How did Sylvia handle all the bills?” but soon that will fade. A surviving spouse’s life adapts and changes to the new environment.

What’s even scarier is the thought that your spouse never learned how to handle the checkbook, pay bills, purchase a car, upgrade cell phone plans, make decisions on extended warranties or plan a vacation.

Make certain that you are both familiar with day-to-day money management skills, or build a relationship with someone to serve as a trusted adviser for the surviving spouse who you fell will place your interests first.

5. When I retire, I need to dramatically shift my investment portfolio away from stocks and into bonds. You’ve probably heard the myth: “Invest your age in bonds and the rest in stocks.” The truth is, everyone’s personal financial situation is unique. You may need to increase your stock allocation in retirement, especially if the bulk of your retirement income comes from non-inflation-protected pensions.

More importantly, you should view your overall investment allocation by including all your investable assets. This might include money in the bank, annuities, the cash value of life insurance, personal investments, retirement accounts — and, yes, even the present value of your pension and Social Security.

With all this data, now you can build an asset allocation that truly reflects your retirement income needs.

5 Giant Myths Of Retirement Planning – Forbes.

This article is adapted from Retiring for the GENIUS, by Marc S. Freedman, published by For the GENIUS Press. Follow Marc on Twitter @retiringgenius.

5 Giant Myths Of Retirement Planning – Forbes Read Post »

Real Reason Brokers Oppose a Fiduciary Standard | Financial Planning

Industry

Real Reason Brokers Oppose a Fiduciary Standard

PAULA DWYER

FEB 27, 2015

(Bloomberg) — Wall Street is wasting no time revving up its lobbying machine now that President Barack Obama has said his administration soon will propose a rule to require brokers to act as fiduciaries when advising clients on their retirement savings.

Asking brokers to put clients’ interests ahead of their own seems like a good idea, yet industry trade groups argue the rule will make investment advice and retirement planning too expensive for low- to middle-income families. If that happened, the argument goes, those families would save less for retirement and, down the road, could be a burden on taxpayers.

One industry group, the National Association of Plan Advisors, which represents professional retirement-plan advisers, goes so far as to call the proposal the “No Advice” rule.

This sounds alarming! Is Obama about to make worse the very problem — too little retirement savings — he says he wants to fix?

That’s the thrust of a memo written by the law firm Debevoise & Plimpton for the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents the chief executive officers of banks, insurers and asset managers. The main evidence comes from a 2011 study by consulting firm Oliver Wyman, which has come to represent the core of the industry’s argument.

That study says lower-income investors prefer to work with brokers (who don’t have a fiduciary duty and are paid through sales commissions, revenue-sharing deals and other fees) over registered investment advisers (who are paid directly out of a client’s pocket and already must put client interests ahead of their own).

Read more via Real Reason Brokers Oppose a Fiduciary Standard | Financial Planning.

Real Reason Brokers Oppose a Fiduciary Standard | Financial Planning Read Post »

You’ll Never Guess Who’s Saving the Most For Retirement

How to reinvent yourself in retirement

Retirement

Retirement is an opportunity for a new chapter of your life, expert says.

You’ll Never Guess Who’s Saving the Most For RetirementMost people today view retirement as an opportunity to begin a new chapter in their lives, “not a time to wind down and move off the playing field,” says gerontologist Ken Dychtwald, 64, the CEO of Age Wave, a research think-tank on aging issues.

They are trying to figure out new ways to be productive. “Many are wondering: ‘What can I do with this stage of my life that is perhaps my highest purpose?’ ” says Dychtwald, who is also a psychologist. He has written 16 books on aging, health and retirement issues.

His company has conducted dozens of studies on retirement over the past 20 years. From that research, he and his colleagues have identified five stages of retirement and how people can make the most of each stage:

Stage 1: Imagination. These are the five to 15 years before retirement. People are sometimes busy raising their children and providing care for one or more parents, Dychtwald says.

How to make the most of this time: Enjoy the vitality of this stage of life and make sure you are preparing financially for retirement, he says. “You should be doing everything you can to build a strong and solid financial base that will last you a lifetime.”

Stage 2: Anticipation. This is from five years until right before retirement. People often start thinking about what they are actually going to do when they retire, but there aren’t many places for them to go for guidance, he says.

Many people want to continue to work. In fact, 72% of pre-retirees, age 50 and older, say they want to keep working after they retire, according to a recent survey sponsored by Merrill Lynch in partnership with Age Wave. Almost half (47%) of current retirees either are working, have worked or plan to work in retirement, the survey found.

Many people also want to devote more time to their family and friends. Some want to continue to learn, and others want to enjoy their favorite hobbies and develop new ones, he says.

How to make the most of this time: Put on your creative cap to find another career, Dychtwald says. Think about an encore career or consider starting your own business, he says. Volunteer at a hospital, church or for a non-profit group. Talk to retired people to see what they’ve done. See if your company has some flexible retirement programs or offers a sabbatical that would create a kind of trial retirement, he says.

Stage 3: Liberation. This begins on retirement day, and people often feel fantastic. They think, “It’s great. I’m free, and I have decades of freedom in front of me.” This is called the honeymoon period, and it lasts an average of one year, Dychtwald says.

How to make the most of this time: “Enjoy it. You’ve earned it,” he says. Many people have been working 30 or 40 years, and like the idea of having a period of life to take a deep breath, enjoy time with family and friends, watch movies and go on trips.

This is a time to “relax, recharge and possibly even retool,” he says. You can consider it a gap year or “intermission” year before you gear up for the next phase.

Ken Dychtwald, CEO of Age Wave, says there are five stages of retirement. (Photo: Handout)

Stage 4: Re-engagement. One to 15 years after retirement. People start wondering: “Who am I now?” “Some people have a real identity crisis. If you’ve been a fireman or a high school principal or CEO, and now you are a retired person, that may not be enough for you,” Dychtwald says.

They may miss the people they used to work with. They may feel a little bored. Last year, the average retiree watched about 49 hours of television a week, he says.

“We have seen in our studies that not everybody is happy with retirement. About half of today’s retirees are very dissatisfied with a life of leisure 24/7,” he says.

That’s why some people try a different line of work. They want more engagement or purpose in their lives, he says.

How to make the most of this time: Do some soul searching. If you’re bored, start looking for your second act. Often community colleges have workshops about finding an encore career. Read books or go to websites such as encore.org. Talk to others who have been through this to see what they did. You might be able to find a hybrid career that meets both your work and retirement needs, he says.

USA TODAY

Building a successful 2nd career near retirement

Stage 5: Reconciliation. This is the stage when people are in their late 70s and early 80s.

How to make the most of this time: It’s a good time to share your values and life lessons with your children, grandchildren or community by recording an audiotape or videotape or writing it down, Dychtwald says. “About seven or eight years ago, I flew to Florida with a video camera and spent days interviewing my mom and dad. I wanted my children and future grandchildren to know what my parents believed and learned in their life.”

Dychtwald says that “thanks to the ever-increasing longevity, many of us will have decades to learn, teach, play, work and re-invent ourselves again and again after our core career has ended. Perhaps it’s time to retire retirement.”

via How to reinvent yourself in retirement.

How to reinvent yourself in retirement Read Post »

How to Balance Spending and Safety in Retirement | Money.com

Retirement

How to Balance Spending and Safety in Retirement

Darrow Kirkpatrick Feb. 19, 2015

150219_RET_SpendingSafety

Every retirement withdrawal method has its pros and cons. Understanding the differences will help you tap your assets in the way that’s best for you.

You’ve saved for years. You’ve built a sizable nest egg. And, finally, you’ve retired. Now, how do you withdraw from your savings so your money lasts as long as you do? Is there a technique, a procedure, a product that will keep you safe?

Unfortunately, there is no perfect answer to this question. Every available solution has its strengths and its weaknesses. Only by understanding the possible approaches, then mixing them together into a personal solution, will you be able to move forward with an enjoyable retirement that balances both spending and safety.

Let’s start with one of the simplest and most popular withdrawal approaches: spending a fixed amount from your portfolio annually. Typically this is adjusted for inflation, so the nominal amount grows over time but sustains the same lifestyle from year to year. If the amount you start with, in year one of your retirement, is 4% of your portfolio, then this is the classic 4% rule.

The advantages of this withdrawal method are that it is relatively simple to implement, and it has been researched extensively. Statistics for the survival probabilities of your portfolio, given a certain time span and asset allocation, are readily available. This strategy seems reliable—you know exactly how much you can spend each year. Until your money runs out. Studies based on historical data show your savings might last for 30 years. But history may not repeat. And fixed withdrawals are inflexible; what if your spending needs change from year to year?

Instead, you could withdraw a fixed percentage of your portfolio annually, say 5%. This is often called an “endowment” approach. The advantage of this is that it automatically builds some flexibility into your withdrawals based on market performance. If the market goes up, your fixed percentage will be a larger sum. If the market goes down, it will be smaller. Even better, you will never run out of money! Because you are withdrawing only a percent of your portfolio, it can never be wiped out. But it could get very small! And your available income will fluctuate, perhaps dramatically, from year to year.

Another approach to variable withdrawals is to base the amount on your life expectancy. (One source for this data is the IRS RMD tables.) Each year you could withdraw the inverse of your life expectancy in years. So if your life expectancy is 30 years, you’d withdraw 1/30, or about 3.3%, in the current year. You will never run out of money, but, again, there is no guarantee exactly how much money you’ll have in your final years. It’s possible you’ll wind up with smaller withdrawals in early retirement and larger withdrawals later, when you aren’t as able to enjoy them.

What if you want more certainty? Annuities appear to solve most of the problems with fixed or variable withdrawals. With an annuity, you give an insurance company some or all of your assets, and, in exchange, they pay you a monthly amount for life. Assuming the company stays solvent, this eliminates the possibility of outliving your assets.

Annuities are good for consistent income. But that’s also their chief drawback: they’re inflexible. If you die early, you will leave a lot of money on the table. If you have an emergency and need a lump sum, you probably can’t get it. Finally, many annuities are not adjusted for inflation. Those that are tend to be very expensive. And inflation can be a large variable over long time spans.

What about income for early retirement? It’s unwise to draw down your assets in the beginning years, when there are decades of uncertainty looming ahead. The goal should be to preserve net worth until you are farther down the road. If your assets are large enough, or the markets are strong enough, you can live off the annual interest, dividends, and growth. If not, you may need to work part-time, supplementing your investment income.

Every retirement withdrawal technique has drawbacks. Some require active management. Some can run out of money. Some don’t maintain your lifestyle. Some can’t handle emergency expenses or preserve principal for heirs. Some may be eroded by inflation.

That’s why I believe most of us are going to construct a flexible, “hybrid” system for living off our assets in retirement. We’ll pick and choose from the available options, combining the benefits, while trying to minimize the liabilities and preserve our flexibility.

Darrow Kirkpatrick is a software engineer and author who lived frugally, invested successfully, and retired in 2011 at age 50. He writes regularly about saving, investing and retiring on his blog CanIRetireYet.com.

via How to Balance Spending and Safety in Retirement | Money.com.

How to Balance Spending and Safety in Retirement | Money.com Read Post »

Scroll to Top